AI is currently garbage in, garbage out. Still at the information stage. Methodology changes needed for the knowledge stage and again for the wisdom stage. And you have to account for the concept that the right thing to do is not necessarily the best thing to do.
When I studied AI, back in the late '80s, one of the profs I had back then said, "THERE IS NOTHING THAT CAN REPLICATE THE HUMAN BRAIN." And yes, AI can make "decisions" but the question is: WHAT ARE THOSE DECISIONS BASED UPON?...We can have bots that do mundane things and that is about it...it takes sensory perception along with a mind that can grasp what is relevant to the human input/output...NOTHING else will matter...
People are saying that AI are going to replace Humans, I know of 3 and they are dialectic of either Marxism, Hegelian theory, or some other "now theory"...
WHAT HAS TO BE PRESENT ALWAYS IS THE SPIRIT OF MAN...and that is what is missing from all of these idiot(s) who espouse this because they DO NOT BELIEVE IN SOMETHING HIGHER THAN THEMSELVES...
I hope I didn't put too many knickers in a twist with this screed but chasing AI is a fools journey and will come to no good in the end...WHEN MAN IS TAKEN OUT OF THE EQUATION THE ONLY THING LEFT IS MENDACITY...basically, a lie!!!!!
Add-on...I had a chemistry professor who at the end of the semester & at final exam, held up two books, a chemistry book and THE BIBLE...HE said, if you believe in this, CHEMISTRY book, you had best believe in this, The Bible...this is what I am saying...
I agree. I broke the code on how to do high level functionality AI sometime ago. Replicates an expert in a complex environment. Turning information into knowledge is the next level. Creating wisdom is the top level. However a surrogate for that is to do the opposite of what ever the left is pushing.
AI is currently garbage in, garbage out. Still at the information stage. Methodology changes needed for the knowledge stage and again for the wisdom stage. And you have to account for the concept that the right thing to do is not necessarily the best thing to do.
When I studied AI, back in the late '80s, one of the profs I had back then said, "THERE IS NOTHING THAT CAN REPLICATE THE HUMAN BRAIN." And yes, AI can make "decisions" but the question is: WHAT ARE THOSE DECISIONS BASED UPON?...We can have bots that do mundane things and that is about it...it takes sensory perception along with a mind that can grasp what is relevant to the human input/output...NOTHING else will matter...
People are saying that AI are going to replace Humans, I know of 3 and they are dialectic of either Marxism, Hegelian theory, or some other "now theory"...
WHAT HAS TO BE PRESENT ALWAYS IS THE SPIRIT OF MAN...and that is what is missing from all of these idiot(s) who espouse this because they DO NOT BELIEVE IN SOMETHING HIGHER THAN THEMSELVES...
I hope I didn't put too many knickers in a twist with this screed but chasing AI is a fools journey and will come to no good in the end...WHEN MAN IS TAKEN OUT OF THE EQUATION THE ONLY THING LEFT IS MENDACITY...basically, a lie!!!!!
Add-on...I had a chemistry professor who at the end of the semester & at final exam, held up two books, a chemistry book and THE BIBLE...HE said, if you believe in this, CHEMISTRY book, you had best believe in this, The Bible...this is what I am saying...
I agree. I broke the code on how to do high level functionality AI sometime ago. Replicates an expert in a complex environment. Turning information into knowledge is the next level. Creating wisdom is the top level. However a surrogate for that is to do the opposite of what ever the left is pushing.