This article is a childish attempt to report on an incident. It's a patchwork of statements and quotes and works very hard to leave a confused impression of what happened. But why expect anything different? This is a CNN article.
The opening statement: "A U.S. Secret Service member fired their gun while being robbed at gunpoint....." Secret Service Member???? What is that? Presidential detail? At gunpoint, then "fires their gun"? And the attacker escapes with the "members" bag? And they're not sure if the attacker was hit? This is utter nonsense. I am more inclined to think that this entire event is fabricated.
This article is a childish attempt to report on an incident. It's a patchwork of statements and quotes and works very hard to leave a confused impression of what happened. But why expect anything different? This is a CNN article.
The opening statement: "A U.S. Secret Service member fired their gun while being robbed at gunpoint....." Secret Service Member???? What is that? Presidential detail? At gunpoint, then "fires their gun"? And the attacker escapes with the "members" bag? And they're not sure if the attacker was hit? This is utter nonsense. I am more inclined to think that this entire event is fabricated.
Well, CNN is not very good about writing. Secret Service Member means Marines. Maybe that one was just walking around off duty. LOL