There are many proofs, over 5000, of the scriptures that have been preserved. If you can show me where any of the verses I quoted have been reconstructed I will gladly accept the correction. But to think a man writing a long time ago is correct just because it's dated is dangerous.
John warns of the many antichrists that came from our own. The entire epistle of II Peter is about false doctrines and false teachers leading people astray, perverting the word of God.
Look at the Greek text concerning Matthew and you will see.
Again, the text is what matters not what a man said. Look at the preserved word of God. And seriously consider this thought. On Judgement day we will all be judged individually. You must read and understand for yourself.
5000 years from now what Joe Biden said about Trump still won't be true.
Here is Eusebius in 312AD quoting the Bible talking about Peter's successors to the episcopate, i.e. Linus.
Paul testifies that Crescens was sent to Gaul [2 Tm 4:10], but Linus, whom he mentions in the Second Letter to Timothy [2 Tm 4:21] as his companion at Rome, was Peter’s successor in the episcopate of the church there, as has already been shown. Clement also, who was appointed third bishop of the church at Rome, was, as Paul testifies, his co-laborer and fellow soldier [Phil 4:3] [ibid., 3:4:9–10]. - Eusebius of Caesarea, Church History, 312AD
Is Eusebius in 312AD quoting the Bible more or less credible than AcesSilver in 2024AD quoting the Bible.
AGAIN, THE TEXT IS WHAT MATTERS NOT WHAT A MAN (i.e. ACESSILVER) SAID. LOOK AT THE PRESERVED WORD OF GOD!
was Peter’s successor in the episcopate of the church there
Being an Overseer/Bishop/Elder/Shepherd or Deacon is an office of the church (There is no office for Cardinal, Priest, or Pope.)
I Timothy 3:1-13
Titus 1:5-16
Acts 20:28
I'm take no issue with any of the scriptures. But men will twist them to meet their needs.
Peter says this in 2 Peter 3:16
There are many proofs, over 5000, of the scriptures that have been preserved. If you can show me where any of the verses I quoted have been reconstructed I will gladly accept the correction. But to think a man writing a long time ago is correct just because it's dated is dangerous.
John warns of the many antichrists that came from our own. The entire epistle of II Peter is about false doctrines and false teachers leading people astray, perverting the word of God.
Look at the Greek text concerning Matthew and you will see.
Strange, Eusebius in 312AD seems to understand reality different than AcesSilver in 2024 AD who is 1700 years removed from the actual events.
Again, the text is what matters not what a man said. Look at the preserved word of God. And seriously consider this thought. On Judgement day we will all be judged individually. You must read and understand for yourself.
5000 years from now what Joe Biden said about Trump still won't be true.
Here is Eusebius in 312AD quoting the Bible talking about Peter's successors to the episcopate, i.e. Linus.
Is Eusebius in 312AD quoting the Bible more or less credible than AcesSilver in 2024AD quoting the Bible.
AGAIN, THE TEXT IS WHAT MATTERS NOT WHAT A MAN (i.e. ACESSILVER) SAID. LOOK AT THE PRESERVED WORD OF GOD!
was Peter’s successor in the episcopate of the church there
Being an Overseer/Bishop/Elder/Shepherd or Deacon is an office of the church (There is no office for Cardinal, Priest, or Pope.) I Timothy 3:1-13 Titus 1:5-16 Acts 20:28
I'm take no issue with any of the scriptures. But men will twist them to meet their needs. Peter says this in 2 Peter 3:16