When the true history of the world is written, we will fully understand what role Henry VIII played. One thing is for sure - Vatican has been compromised by the secret occult for a long time, one could argue that the very existence of Vatican / Pope is because the Satanists subverted Jesus teachings.
Henry VIII played a very important role in breaking the grip of the Vatican. Him wanting annulment of his marriage with Katherine brought up so many issues to the front where it concerns the role of the Church and Pope and just how much they oughta control people's lives.
More was amongst the people who tried to stop this, to tried to keep Vatican all powerful, and while the actual charges against him is probably fake, he died because she stood on the wrong side of this.
Actually, his actions were counterreactions to Katherine's position of being a catholic woman with no great faults refusing to dissappear into a monastery. That is an example that one person can change the world. Her position created a church of England as a result. What do you mean by stating that she was on the wrong side. She was raised as a catholic and a princess of a powerful royal family. She was a woman of her times. You can't expect her being a revolutionary. She was defending her faith and her name.
When the true history of the world is written, we will fully understand what role Henry VIII played. One thing is for sure - Vatican has been compromised by the secret occult for a long time, one could argue that the very existence of Vatican / Pope is because the Satanists subverted Jesus teachings.
Henry VIII played a very important role in breaking the grip of the Vatican. Him wanting annulment of his marriage with Katherine brought up so many issues to the front where it concerns the role of the Church and Pope and just how much they oughta control people's lives.
More was amongst the people who tried to stop this, to tried to keep Vatican all powerful, and while the actual charges against him is probably fake, he died because she stood on the wrong side of this.
Actually, his actions were counterreactions to Katherine's position of being a catholic woman with no great faults refusing to dissappear into a monastery. That is an example that one person can change the world. Her position created a church of England as a result. What do you mean by stating that she was on the wrong side. She was raised as a catholic and a princess of a powerful royal family. She was a woman of her times. You can't expect her being a revolutionary. She was defending her faith and her name.
Ah, looks like I made a typo. I meant to say "he was on the wrong side" not "she", sorry.
I see, ty for clarification