Julian Assange has reportedly agreed to plead guilty to violating the Espionage Act, in exchange for release from prison. Just a reminder: "possessing or accessing" material related to the "national defense" of the USA is something that the NYT, WaPo, WSJ, CNN, etc. do every day - The Great Awakening

Julian Assange has reportedly agreed to plead guilty to violating the Espionage Act, in exchange for release from prison. Just a reminder: "possessing or accessing" material related to the "national defense" of the USA is something that the NYT, WaPo, WSJ, CNN, etc. do every day (twitter.com) 🤬 MSM SCUMBAGS 😡

posted 223 days ago by Joys1Daughter 223 days ago by Joys1Daughter +178 / -0

16 comments

16 comments share save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (16)

sorted by:

▲ -1 ▼

– MamaTried -1 points 223 days ago +2 / -3

There is a difference.

Assange pleaded guilty to

"knowingly and unlawfully conspiring with Chelsea Manning" to violate the Espionage Act and that he committed overt acts including unlawful acts to do this. Basically he was not just a recipient of the files Manning hacked. He helped with the hack.

Here's the court documents

Assange will appear in US court in Saipan in 2 days https://washingtonpost.com/documents/19edfb4f-af7c-41c6-96d4-c9a8e810863f.pdf?itid=lk_inline_manual_5

Here's what he pleases guilty to. Not very detailed

https://www.washingtonpost.com/documents/7fe103fc-a347-4989-856a-f07986b19680.pdf?itid=lk_inline_manual_7

In exchange for his plea the other hacking charges were dropped.

permalink save report block reply

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q