to dig up an old picture incriminating someone because of their t shirt and company is to totally misunderstand the plan
This is common practice here, though. The old "guilt by association" gambit is used all the time. Getting photographed next to HRC or Bill, or Fauci, or Bill Gates, or Jeff Bezos, or Epstein is more than enough to convince people that they're guilty of something, just because they were photographed standing next to someone.
And then you have all the symbology of red shoes and purple triangular spirals and such.
How about getting photographed eating pizza, or standing next to a pizza place, or talking about pizza on twitter/X? Many people would be ready and willing to burn that person to death, convinced they were a pedophile. ⁷
This is common practice here, though. The old "guilt by association" gambit is used all the time. Getting photographed next to HRC or Bill, or Fauci, or Bill Gates, or Jeff Bezos, or Epstein is more than enough to convince people that they're guilty of something, just because they were photographed standing next to someone.
And then you have all the symbology of red shoes and purple triangular spirals and such.
How about getting photographed eating pizza, or standing next to a pizza place, or talking about pizza on twitter/X? Many people would be ready and willing to burn that person to death, convinced they were a pedophile. ⁷