259 “A Private Citizen Cannot Criminally Prosecute Anyone, Let Alone a Former President” – Clarence Thomas Questions Jack Smith’s Authority in Blistering Opinion on Immunity Ruling (www.thegatewaypundit.com) posted 175 days ago by LakotaPride 175 days ago by LakotaPride +259 / -0 "A Private Citizen Cannot Criminally Prosecute Anyone, Let Alone a Former President" - Clarence Thomas Questions Jack Smith's Au... Conservative Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas questioned Jack Smith’s authority as special counsel in his concurring opinion on the high court’s presidential immunity ruling. 30 comments share 30 comments share save hide report block hide replies
I assume this opinion holds no force?
They will go back to ignore the courts.
There's nothing to ignore here.
What Thomas wrote has no more force than what the losing judges wrote in their dissents.
It's not want this case was about and what he wrote is not part of the majority opinion.
It's like a bonus track on a CD or a DVD extra
Perhaps it will help guide or aid Judge Cannon as I believe she apparently is the one that will be addressing this subject.
I think it's a signal to her, but legally it holds no weight and she should ignore it. It's almost 100% why Thomas thought to include this.
Every judge who looked at this question found the opposite.
I suspect they will ignore SCOTUS, Jackson did this in the past.
Yes, it seems this is not part of the ruling today.