Welcome to General Chat - GAW Community Area
This General Chat area started off as a place for people to talk about things that are off topic, however it has quickly evolved into a community and has become an integral part of the GAW experience for many of us.
Based on its evolving needs and plenty of user feedback, we are trying to bring some order and institute some rules. Please make sure you read these rules and participate in the spirit of this community.
Rules for General Chat
-
Be respectful to each other. This is of utmost importance, and comments may be removed if deemed not respectful.
-
Avoid long drawn out arguments. This should be a place to relax, not to waste your time needlessly.
-
Personal anecdotes, puzzles, cute pics/clips - everything welcome
-
Please do not spam at the top level. If you have a lot to post each day, try and post them all together in one top level comment
-
Try keep things light. If you are bringing in deep stuff, try not to go overboard.
-
Things that are clearly on-topic for this board should be posted as a separate post and not here (except if you are new and still getting the feel of this place)
-
If you find people violating these rules, deport them rather than start a argument here.
-
Feel free to give feedback as these rules are expected to keep evolving
In short, imagine this thread to be a local community hall where we all gather and chat daily. Please be respectful to others in the same way
I was thrown for a loop on the presidential immunity case. I expected them to rule against Prez immunity and then the plan would be to go after past presidents. So, does this ruling mean POTUS can commit crimes while in office? Murder US citizens for instance (as the MSM are suggesting)? I am hoping someone can clarify because I want to see Bush, Clinton, Obama prosecuted for the crimes they committed while serving. Also, what about the crime of treason? Is POTUS immune from treason laws? Thanks fellow Frogs!
If the Potus killed US citizens for some made up decision, he would not be acting under and official Presidential policy. He would NOT be immune. TREASON...Noone is immune from TREASON. If it is proven that Bush had knowledge of 911 and did nothing about it... I would say that is a Treasonous act, so no immunity. Clinton lied and got nothing for having sex in office and should be held accountable, but all of his and Hillary's Clintoncides and Arkancides should come back to bite them; so no Immunity. And Obama, by giving Iran pallets of money and him and Eric Holder with the gun running should both be held accountable.
Sounds like they are immune from all those crimes now at least in the criminal justice system. See, this is very confusing. Presidents are now above the law and are allowed to conduct criminal acts against other citizens. They can say we are at war against disinfo and start killing american journalists and anons now, right?
This is what the LEFTISTS want to do. As of Biden's speech about the Immunity, he and the other Former Presidents all know about the Immunity. They are changing the narrative in order to continue sending President Trump to court for 'so called' crimes he committed while in office. However, since the SCOTUS has defined what Presidential Immunity is, now Biden can NOT use LawFare on Trump and continue having him appear in court. They want Presidential Immunity for themselves and all the other Former Presidents; just not for Trump. They play their little games however they wish to play it and change the rules in the middle.