I've talked to consultants and lawyers, and have yet to have one of them disagree that the Chevron deference decisions are the most consequential SC decisions in a century in terms of striking at the heart of the Deep/Administrative State. Yet, I have not heard ONE WORD about it from ANY 'media' since the day the decisions were announced including Faux News/Business. It almost seems as if the media thinks that if they don't talk about it, it didn't happen... Anybody have any thoughts on this? Is everyone waiting for 'the other shoe to drop'? Pray tell what that might be....
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (68)
sorted by:
I’ve had this thought for a while, but you articulated this well. I think part of the great awakening is people deciding for themselves what news is important rather than letting legacy media decide for us. Unfortunately, too many people still rely on being told what to think. It really is strange to be witness to this phenomenon.