I've talked to consultants and lawyers, and have yet to have one of them disagree that the Chevron deference decisions are the most consequential SC decisions in a century in terms of striking at the heart of the Deep/Administrative State. Yet, I have not heard ONE WORD about it from ANY 'media' since the day the decisions were announced including Faux News/Business. It almost seems as if the media thinks that if they don't talk about it, it didn't happen... Anybody have any thoughts on this? Is everyone waiting for 'the other shoe to drop'? Pray tell what that might be....
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (68)
sorted by:
Several months ago I watched a Trump rally on Newsmax and immediatelyafter the rally ended a Newsmax newsreader babe came on and said that "during the rally Trump claimed that the 2020 election was stolen. However Newsmax believes that Joe Biden won the 2020 election fair and square." Haven't watched Newsmax since, and I never will.
Good to know. I don't watch Newsmax, but someone close to me does, and I wanted to be sure that he knew about the importance of the Chevron deference decision, and apparently they did cover it.