Has someone quietly opened the floodgates for positive cancer publications discussing "conspiracy theory" treatments like Ivermectin Chlorine Dioxide? - The Great Awakening

192

Has someone quietly opened the floodgates for positive cancer publications discussing "conspiracy theory" treatments like Ivermectin Chlorine Dioxide?

posted 165 days ago by HelloDolly 165 days ago by HelloDolly +192 / -0

Have never been able to find this information so easily on Google before. Even discussing the much maligned "DON"T DRINK BLEACH!" and describing it as "without side effects" LOL. Interdasting.

https://europepmc.org/article/ppr/ppr666536

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304383523001696

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/09603271221143693

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36381770/

32 comments

32 comments share save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (32)

sorted by:

▲ 2 ▼

– Mountaingale 2 points 165 days ago +3 / -1

That chlorine can definitely give a person a punk tummy. I couldn't get past 12 drops. However if you brush your teeth with it you will have no plaque at all.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 3 ▼

– PeaceCrew 3 points 165 days ago +3 / -0

Andreas Kalcker shows how to make CDS instead, which is just pure Cl02 gas dissolved in water without the presence of Chlorite, which means it's much easier on the stomache:

https://www.brighteon.com/98951596-048d-403f-85c3-db5ff006d0ef

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 1 ▼

– Mountaingale 1 point 162 days ago +1 / -0

Thank you!

permalink parent save report block reply

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q