competing social constructs

That's because COM + SOC + CON imply "together", while nature implies being set apart from one another. It's ones CONsent to suggested SOCialism which tempts many into COMpetition against each other.

These conflicts against one another are called "reason".

imposed on biological reality

a) Reality implies ones response (re) to all (al) perceivable...bio (life) + logic (reason) implies life reasoning against one another over each others suggestions.

b) To impose implies to lay upon...ones consent to any suggested information implies taken on from another and into self. Only by consent of many can few layer fiction (suggested information) upon reality (perceivable inspiration)...making it in return harder and harder for ones sight to see through the layers of deception.

Prime example...suggested words over perceivable sound. The majority view reality through the lens of suggested words/brands/definitions/meanings/truths by few. This is called spell-craft and nobody forces one to consent or uphold theses crafted spells within a moving reality.

profound spiritual implications

a) Profound implies foundation (found) forwarding (pro) aka flow (inception towards death) forwarding form (life).

b) Spiritual (Latin spiro; to breathe) implies form adapting to being forwarded within flow, hence inhaling and exhaling.

c) Implication (if/then) is derived from being (life) driven (inception towards death) forwards, hence...if flow (motion); then form (matter).

harnessing the energy of others

If all is one in EN'ERGY, noun (Gr. work) - "internal or inherent power", then velocity (inception towards death) generates resistance (life) by setting whole apart internally, which for each ones life implies...needing to resist wanted temptation.

For one (perception) within all (perceivable)...other ones (suggestion) imply a temptation to ignore resisting, hence falling for each other or intercourse for off-spring being simultaneously tempted with lust for one another.

This brings one back to nature setting apart, while those within are tempting each other together.

Resistance (matter) can only exist at the center of temptation (motion), hence harnessing each being from one another. Few are tempting many to spend resistance within conflicts of reason against each other, which in return permits few to harness resistance without spending on others.

psychological manipulation

a) Psyche implies animating power; logy implies reasoning about something affixed, while ignoring to be (life) animated (inception towards death).

b) Perception implies psyche, while ones manual consent to suggestion establishes logy aka a conflict of reason among many around an affixed suggestion by few at center.

This implies circumcision aka few erecting at center (suggestion), while cutting of many into circumference (reason). If one reasons, then one chooses a side, hence tempting choice from center into circumference aka off-balance.

Only within motion can there be balance, and only within balance can there be choice.

as old as humanity

a) Old implies versus new...a conflict of reason about a suggested side, while ignoring ones sight within perceivable NOW. A being (life) within momentum (inception towards death) of motion can only perceive a perceivable MOMENT(um) aka now...not before or after.

b) Human implies hue of man aka color of man aka visible spectrum (momentum) within light (motion) for each ray (matter) within.

Male (motion) through female (momentum) into trans-formed child (matter)....not a conflict about old vs new, but internal separation of ingredients within base aka alchemy (chemistry of all). NOW implies the cauldron for partial ingredient within all base.

The easy response is to say that there are a lot of stupid people but it's a lot deeper than that.

Stupid/stupor - "cessation of motion"...that implies ones ignorance of being (life) moved (inception towards death). Few suggest progressivism to tempt many towards outcome, while ignoring perceivable origin. The suggested rhetoric "stupid" then tempts many to placate each other as not being progressive enough.

In short...motion operates a lot deeper than those within believing in the cessation (stupid) thereof, while drowning in it.

I've always had an aversion to cheering crowds

Because many cheer on few, who in return utilize many against one standing out from many...like the one having an aversion to follow orders.

even cheering crowds from "my side"

Change sides to notice that both are aiming at the same source, hence giving consent to same suggestion (abortion) from opposing sides (pro-life vs pro-choice).

It doesn't matter which side one consents from or how many others one has behind or before one...only that one ignores self (ones choice) for the suggestion of another (chosen one) by choosing a side, hence shirking response-ability (free will of choice).

Pro-life vs pro-choice not only sustains suggested abortion, but those suggesting abortion have the chutzpah to mock those consenting with an open contradiction...life implies choice; choice implies life.

• "I choose pro-life with my choice" vs "I choose pro-choice while alive"

Both sides are focusing on abortion, while being blind to the implied contradiction.

Once you see it you can't unsee it.

Ignorance is bliss...never underestimate the power of temptation over ones resistance, which is only fertile while resisting.