Epidemiology is the health of people, not persons. It bends pathology for psychology, politics, logistics, and triage. Ultimately falling wherever it needs to to continue confidence in the healthcare infrastructure being used.
It's heavy on lies, especially where a country prevents discrimination against the sick and disabled. In that case, legalities require discriminating against everyone in the hope of catching the margin of extremely sick people who will overwhelm hospitals that measure their spare, unutilized ICU beds in 1s per hundreds of thousands of people. They usually can't handle more than 10 or 20 per million people getting unexpectedly sick for weeks or months across a whole region.
That's the nicest case. In the nicest case, they are lying and psychologically abusing and rallying the masses to attack the truth and drilling holes in constitutionality and subjecting millions of people to unnecessary, experimental treatment because they can't legally subject a few thousand marginal, very sick people to experimental treatment.
In the WEF Reset case, Trump went off script by accidentally winning the presidency and the rest of the developed world panicked and stalled instead of running off the cliff together. In that case, we saw SARS 2002, a disease on training wheels, gave it a head start instead of shutting it down like in 2002-2003, controlled the media, and used the panic to rig an election and oust the guy who wasn't supposed to be there at that time.
because they can't legally subject a few thousand marginal, very sick people to experimental treatment.
I doubt the thought of helping sick people even crossed their mind. "because they can make money on patents" makes a lot more sense about the root cause. 2nd cause being "because they can get away with it with little risk". Whether the patent is for something that causes more harm than good or a cure is of no matter.
Same for climate science. The important thing is to get peer approved and funding for the next study. Not make a realistic, repeatable, or useful prediction.
In Canada we did it to save face. Our hospitals lost a fortune in billings on account of cancelled surgeries and still having to pay staff to TikTok. Our insurance companies were probably loving it.
If we'd tried handling things scientifically, like Sweden, our logistics would have failed. We're a failing state and wouldn't have been able to handle a couple hundred critically ill people.
Granted the pharma companies made a fortune off of us. We bought enough doses to do Canada 10 times over. We had to throw most of it out thankfully.
“Public Health” exists merely an administrative state mechanism to manipulate & infringe upon individual rights.
Piers is every moron's hero...
I don't think he believes a fraction of the crap he says. He's an actor...
Piers is full blown moisturizing beta male.
Epidemiology is the health of people, not persons. It bends pathology for psychology, politics, logistics, and triage. Ultimately falling wherever it needs to to continue confidence in the healthcare infrastructure being used.
It's heavy on lies, especially where a country prevents discrimination against the sick and disabled. In that case, legalities require discriminating against everyone in the hope of catching the margin of extremely sick people who will overwhelm hospitals that measure their spare, unutilized ICU beds in 1s per hundreds of thousands of people. They usually can't handle more than 10 or 20 per million people getting unexpectedly sick for weeks or months across a whole region.
That's the nicest case. In the nicest case, they are lying and psychologically abusing and rallying the masses to attack the truth and drilling holes in constitutionality and subjecting millions of people to unnecessary, experimental treatment because they can't legally subject a few thousand marginal, very sick people to experimental treatment.
In the WEF Reset case, Trump went off script by accidentally winning the presidency and the rest of the developed world panicked and stalled instead of running off the cliff together. In that case, we saw SARS 2002, a disease on training wheels, gave it a head start instead of shutting it down like in 2002-2003, controlled the media, and used the panic to rig an election and oust the guy who wasn't supposed to be there at that time.
I doubt the thought of helping sick people even crossed their mind. "because they can make money on patents" makes a lot more sense about the root cause. 2nd cause being "because they can get away with it with little risk". Whether the patent is for something that causes more harm than good or a cure is of no matter.
Same for climate science. The important thing is to get peer approved and funding for the next study. Not make a realistic, repeatable, or useful prediction.
In Canada we did it to save face. Our hospitals lost a fortune in billings on account of cancelled surgeries and still having to pay staff to TikTok. Our insurance companies were probably loving it.
If we'd tried handling things scientifically, like Sweden, our logistics would have failed. We're a failing state and wouldn't have been able to handle a couple hundred critically ill people.
Granted the pharma companies made a fortune off of us. We bought enough doses to do Canada 10 times over. We had to throw most of it out thankfully.