I've been hunting since I was 13. Not to brag, but just for context, I can hit a (slow) moving turkey at the base of the neck from 100 yards with an open sight.
I will rate my marksmanship more highly than your movie appreciation
It doesn't affect my recollection of successful attempts against Lincoln
Lincoln was quite possibly faked. All of the others have different organizations behind them than history records. Both FDR and Reagan were almost certainly intended to not succeed but were either intended to create a "political victim" (FDR) or intended as a warning (Reagan).
You have to actually dig in to history to see the fuckery. There is so much more on every single one of those events that isn't recorded in the standard version of history, but that you can find in congressional reports, biographies, financial records, etc. that paint a very different picture than the one given to the masses.
Regardless, in none of those cases were any of them hit in a way that will be completely obvious to the whole world, yet actually completely harmless to the "victim." Those "coincidences" are, I suggest, anything but coincidental.
Frens, let's not fight each other. Let's save it for the true foe. Let's not forget who our true enemy is (starts with S) and how he uses our emotions to manipulate us.
I'm not sure why you are responding to me in that way. I'm not really doing that much "fighting," nor are my emotions heated in any way (am I coming across that way)?
From my perspective, I am trying to help people understand how little is organic in the world (at least on the scale of stuff that makes it to the media). There are false flags everywhere, and everything is controlled opposition. People need to see that, really grok that, before people can wake up; before people can accept the real solution to the madness that is the "real world" (which is anything but real).
Didn't mean to single you out, Slyver. And belive me, I get you. I very much enjoy your posts and your keen observations actually. I was just speaking generally to the folks in this thread. Cheers, fren.
I said "completely obvious" not "oblivious." His "face wound", the streak of blood across his face as he stood up to the camera; everyone will see that blood. It was in a perfect place for it to have maximum drama, while at the same time, it won't even affect his shaving tomorrow. It was completely harmless.
As for Lincoln, I am not convinced he died in the assassination attempt. I'm not going to get in to my investigation into that at this time, but there is a ton of shit that suggests that might not have been the case. I can say with reasonable confidence that either Lincoln didn't die that night, or that his son (Robert) was complicit in the assassination (which would also imply him as complicit in the assassinations of Garfield and McKinley).
some that were failures
Some were failures. Spectacular failures. Spectacular failures that turned out to be incredibly helpful to the "victim" (like FDR). In order to really understand these things, you have to understand that organizations like the KKK, or the corporatacracy that supposedly attempted to assassinate FDR were actually his biggest proponents. In order to understand that, you should probably read my report.
Regardless, this shit happens all the time. Where do you think Smollett got the idea from? History is absolutely riddled with such fake failed assassinations that vaulted people to some social victory (political, financial, "social justice," etc.).
I've been hunting since I was 13. Not to brag, but just for context, I can hit a (slow) moving turkey at the base of the neck from 100 yards with an open sight.
I wasn't talking about hollywood movies, I was talking about my comprehensive investigation into the past.
Lincoln was quite possibly faked. All of the others have different organizations behind them than history records. Both FDR and Reagan were almost certainly intended to not succeed but were either intended to create a "political victim" (FDR) or intended as a warning (Reagan).
You have to actually dig in to history to see the fuckery. There is so much more on every single one of those events that isn't recorded in the standard version of history, but that you can find in congressional reports, biographies, financial records, etc. that paint a very different picture than the one given to the masses.
Regardless, in none of those cases were any of them hit in a way that will be completely obvious to the whole world, yet actually completely harmless to the "victim." Those "coincidences" are, I suggest, anything but coincidental.
Frens, let's not fight each other. Let's save it for the true foe. Let's not forget who our true enemy is (starts with S) and how he uses our emotions to manipulate us.
I'm not sure why you are responding to me in that way. I'm not really doing that much "fighting," nor are my emotions heated in any way (am I coming across that way)?
From my perspective, I am trying to help people understand how little is organic in the world (at least on the scale of stuff that makes it to the media). There are false flags everywhere, and everything is controlled opposition. People need to see that, really grok that, before people can wake up; before people can accept the real solution to the madness that is the "real world" (which is anything but real).
Didn't mean to single you out, Slyver. And belive me, I get you. I very much enjoy your posts and your keen observations actually. I was just speaking generally to the folks in this thread. Cheers, fren.
I said "completely obvious" not "oblivious." His "face wound", the streak of blood across his face as he stood up to the camera; everyone will see that blood. It was in a perfect place for it to have maximum drama, while at the same time, it won't even affect his shaving tomorrow. It was completely harmless.
As for Lincoln, I am not convinced he died in the assassination attempt. I'm not going to get in to my investigation into that at this time, but there is a ton of shit that suggests that might not have been the case. I can say with reasonable confidence that either Lincoln didn't die that night, or that his son (Robert) was complicit in the assassination (which would also imply him as complicit in the assassinations of Garfield and McKinley).
Some were failures. Spectacular failures. Spectacular failures that turned out to be incredibly helpful to the "victim" (like FDR). In order to really understand these things, you have to understand that organizations like the KKK, or the corporatacracy that supposedly attempted to assassinate FDR were actually his biggest proponents. In order to understand that, you should probably read my report.
Regardless, this shit happens all the time. Where do you think Smollett got the idea from? History is absolutely riddled with such fake failed assassinations that vaulted people to some social victory (political, financial, "social justice," etc.).