The first three shots were consistent with alleged weapon A, the next five were consistent with alleged weapon B, and the final “acoustic impulse” was emitted by a possible weapon C,
3 shots by the kid on the roof. Counter Sniper fire and something with may not a shot at all.
Good point, that crossed my mind too.
But surely, the forensics experts must have taken that into account too.
I don't know your source
aslan's post, grain of salt, cnn
3 shots by the kid on the roof. Counter Sniper fire and something with may not a shot at all.