It's hard for me to put much importance on this type of thing when looking at it objectively.
If it was some little obscure law practice or other business then it might have been significant.
But it's a large, global and prestigious law firm that's over 150 years old. I'm sure if someone took the time to look into it there could be hundreds of connections between it and Trump.
Law practices and politics go hand in hand. I would wager that there are more former lawyers in Congress than any other occupation. The lawyers who are elected to Congress are high achievers who work at prestigious law firms so it's not out of the ordinary for them to work at Sidley Austin. Michelle Obama worked there and when this Q post was dropped most Anons associated it with her.
This is one thing I find so frustrating about Q drops. Don't get me wrong, I love Q and I think he/they have done much to shine a light on evil doings of the world. But so many of his posts are just too vague to do much with and I end up feeling like I've wasted time trying to find the meaning to it. And much of it is completely subjective to how someone interprets it, anyway. One of the things I like to do is read back over old posts and see how ideas have changed as to what the Q posts mean. Something what would have gotten you a ban for saying 2 years ago becomes a commonly held theory, and vice versa.
It's hard for me to put much importance on this type of thing when looking at it objectively.
If it was some little obscure law practice or other business then it might have been significant.
But it's a large, global and prestigious law firm that's over 150 years old. I'm sure if someone took the time to look into it there could be hundreds of connections between it and Trump.
Law practices and politics go hand in hand. I would wager that there are more former lawyers in Congress than any other occupation. The lawyers who are elected to Congress are high achievers who work at prestigious law firms so it's not out of the ordinary for them to work at Sidley Austin. Michelle Obama worked there and when this Q post was dropped most Anons associated it with her.
This is one thing I find so frustrating about Q drops. Don't get me wrong, I love Q and I think he/they have done much to shine a light on evil doings of the world. But so many of his posts are just too vague to do much with and I end up feeling like I've wasted time trying to find the meaning to it. And much of it is completely subjective to how someone interprets it, anyway. One of the things I like to do is read back over old posts and see how ideas have changed as to what the Q posts mean. Something what would have gotten you a ban for saying 2 years ago becomes a commonly held theory, and vice versa.