If not for those meddeling patriots alerting a cop that there was a shooter on that roof and that cop alerting that sniper and that sniper blowing yearicks brains out Yearick would have been snuck out of there and Crooks would have been swatted within hours.
Think that over and put the puzzle pieces together.
If Trump gets his brains blown apart, all focus is on that. Nobody is focused on the roof at that point. Even as it played out, Trump merely being grazed created enough of a story that the roof was not mentioned for over an hour on every media outlet. They gave the audience no sense of the overhead layout for a very long time. Also, they probably did not plan on rally attendees spotting the shooter. In an alternate timeline where nobody from the rally alerts police as to the presence of the shooter and the shooter is successful, I could easily see how he could be allowed to disappear behind the ladder.
I believe there is a reason no media gave us any sense of the layout of the area for over an hour. They were providing cover because the attempt failed and narratives needed to be rewritten on the fly. The less information the news gives the audience, the easier it is to accomplish this. Once they decided which story they were going to proceed with, that's when we were suddenly given more information and video angles. Just like in Dallas 1963, I believe far more people at that rally were complicit in the plan than people realize.
Yes!
This is another question I have. If there was one shooter only, we are supposed to believe the first shots were so inaccurate they struck people way up in the bleachers. Then the next shot was so accurate it was nearly a kill shot? It doesn't add up.
I see a few possibilities:
I think maybe one shooter was firing distraction shots into the crowd while the other was aiming for Trump.
Perhaps one shooter was a good shot and the patsy was an off the charts terrible shot.
Another possibility is that another sniper farther away was spotted and critically wounded which then caused the would be assassin to start firing wildly into the crowd
Did you see this? It may support a second shooter and prove a second simultaneous assassinion op.
https://greatawakening.win/p/17teNkEsLw/what-is-the-dod-glass-and-cory-c/c/
Wow. Very interesting.
I think Yearick was the primary shooter. I think it was his 1st shot that hit Trump of three initial shots. A cluster of shots comes next, maybe as many as 4-5 which could have been Yearick gone crazy-er and includes the sniper's round unless the one late precusion sound is the snipers. I've had a hard time placing the second round of shots. I am open to a second shooter it just would have to be a secret cleverly concealed weapon probably held by one of the SS near Trump and they would have also failed...
I am with you that Yearick was the actual shooter after having looked into it.