Let’s not forget that Trump was at a podium so he was speaking from a known position, the s is why so many leaders have been assassinated while giving speeches. A remotely controlled rifle could have been employed from a very small hole in the building just large enough for the barrel. A suppressed weapon does not quiet the sonic crack when using standard velocity ammunition, it just muffles the report of the gasses expanding from the barrel. Now imagine for a moment that an IR laser designator “not visible to the naked eye” was used to paint Trumps head and was fired remotely. What if the woman that was watching her phone “ the one they said was the FBI assistant director” was actually seeing that IR laser dot on the screen and had control of the trigger remotely? This would also support my suspicion that the bullet was fired from the building directly across from the shooter’s position across the pond. It is also roughly the same distance away as the patsy location. I know it’s in the weeds but it’s worth considering, given the government resources it’s not inconceivable.