16 But blessed are your eyes, for they see: and your ears, for they hear.
17 For verily I say unto you, That many prophets and righteous men have desired to see those things which ye see, and have not seen them; and to hear those things which ye hear, and have not heard them.
When they look back on this time, in posterity, there will be incredible humiliation at what some people have taken as truth and the incalculable damage they caused their own off spring. The information war has done incredible damage to the point that reality itself is bending. Case in point Caitlin Clark and Angel Reese.
I'm "athletic" or rather I'm 6'6 and got picked alot to play sports. Regardless I have a certain affinity and casual interest for most sports. I've long argued that if you put the #1 QB and the #50 QB in the world on a field together, the vast majority of the population couldn't tell the difference about who is better. The "Madden Ratings" get it wrong. They're all 99. It's the number after the decimal sign that we can argue about. #1 QB is 99.98 #50 QB is 99.58 - there's virtually no distinguishable difference to the common man.
Except Caitlin Clark is an anomaly. It's clear as day that she's otherworldly and yet, there's this argument, that this tall scrub is somehow even in the same conversation about rookie of the year. Caitlin Clark is MVP. This is further evidence of a clear break in our shared reality. In no world is Angel Reese a better basketball player than Caitlin Chark. Not one. And yet all these talking heads in sports are only proving 1 of 2 things. Either they can't see or they're only talking shit because Caitlin is a White catholic from the Midwest and Angel Reese is black and played at LSU. They're actually sowing cultural division for ratings? That's actually pretty disgusting of "sports journalism" imho.
I say all of that to highlight the immense damage that the shattering of reality is having on the unawakened and the damage it continues to do to those already awakened. My eyes do not deceive me. Your eyes do not deceive you.
Men can be women? Women can be men? Biden is steam rolling Trump? There isnt an immigrant invasion? It's all inverted? Upside down? Downside up?
No. Not really. None of that is true anymore. You're a dude pretending to be a women and I reserve the right to not interact with you.
And yet sooooooo many people believe the opposite. So many people continue to gaslight the very nature of reality until words and definitions are spiraling into incoherence and buffoonary. How can a war on language have so much physically devastating effects? How can so many politicians answer questions, without ever actually addressing the question given to them? They glass over their own lie and gaslight us into thinking that we're the crazy one for thinking that they could possibly be criminally corrupt.
I think it boils down to a few key points of reality and i want to reassure you, the reader, of a few things in reality.
Caitlin Clark is the most electrifying women basketball player ever. (it's not even close)
Lawlessness is bad and too much law is tyranny. (That's a construct that we can argue about)
Men have penises and women have vaginas. (That's biology. That's reality.)
Joe Biden is a geriatric patient. (He's not even close to living in reality and theres no way hes commander in chief)
Donald Trump is clearly going to be POTUS. (It's not even close.)
Christ is King (it's not even close to being close.)
What do we do when we are living in the matrix and are unable to wake from it?
The best way to navigate is through prayer and fasting but I'm a believer that thinks that we should remain private about our conversations with our Heavenly Father. So what else?
Sometimes the best way to fight back is as simple as calling out objective reality and it seems strange that when the people of the future look back on our digital footprints and study us, that they might understand the difficulty we faced just in agreeing to what objective reality is and the polarizing effect it has bestowed upon the masses. .
Do not be deceived fren
If you repeat that enough times and sound authoritative enough I might start to believe. I base my thinking on 'authority, tradition, revelation and dogma.'
Idc .... ur arguing w scripture not me.
The master is coming. Believe me, don't believe me .... idc
Yes, the master is coming...the master is coming...
The off the cuff tone makes me think you really don't care. And yet you keep engaging. It's as though you ridicule from the shadows, bc u feel safe there. It's OK fren I won't harm you. But either stfu or play your "authority, tradition, revelation dogma" card and be precise with your description of morality and ethics.
Otherwise you're boring me
I don't have to play a card. That's what you do. I am a free thinker, something Q highlighted many times.
Q: "Free thought" is a philosophical viewpoint which holds that positions regarding truth should be formed on the basis of logic, reason, and empiricism, rather than authority, tradition, revelation, or dogma.
u/#q3906