Another way to confirm the assassination attempt was a set up if we can find the right video - The Great Awakening

Another way to confirm the assassination attempt was a set up if we can find the right video 🧐 Research Wanted 🤔

posted 49 days ago by enough_of_the_racism 49 days ago by enough_of_the_racism +28 / -0

A few days ago, I posted this request for a video.

https://greatawakening.win/p/17teNr2Q7t/has-anyone-seen-video-from-just-/

I’ve been trying to find a video that’s framed up like the picture on that post but I wanted to see for about a minute before the shooting. Here is what I'm thinking... Anytime I have ever seen a photographer at work, they’ll line up some pictures take a few photos see what they got, maybe line up a different angle take a few photos see what they got move around and try a different angle, etc. Now by this point, I think we all agree that it was a set up. The networks were there and this high speed photographer was there in order to catch the moment the bullet left Trump’s skull with his beautiful brains following. These people are sick!

Even with a high-speed camera, once you hear the gun go off, you can’t line up your shot and start triggering rapid fire. You’d be a second or two too late. I’m gonna bet if we find video from a few minutes before, this photographer has his camera pointed at Trump with the shutter engaged continually for at least a minute before. He didn’t drop the camera down to check his work, change any settings or nothing. Even if he was close with the planning, he wouldn’t know the exact moment it would happen, and certainly didn’t want to accidentally miss it. I’m going to guess he has 5000 photos because he was just letting the camera run so that he would have every gory detail of when the bullet hit at any moment. So if anyone sees that video and can verify my theory, let us know please.

6 comments

6 comments share save hide report block hide replies

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q

Comments (6)

sorted by:

▲ 3 ▼

– Vapourface 3 points 49 days ago +3 / -0

It would be (maybe) useful to know if cameras of that sort can run "forever" in that mode, overwriting the storage card, and then you stop it once the event has happened knowing you have the previous 3minutes or whatever, or whether there is a certain limit related to the size of memory card, forcing the cameraman to predict when the event will happen, so it is within the limit.

permalink save report block reply

– enough_of_the_racism [S] 3 points 49 days ago +3 / -0

While absolutely not my area of expertise, my first thought was if each picture is 2 MB, that gives you 500 pictures per gig and if you have a memory card that’s 500 gigs which I don’t think is unreasonable these days, that gives you 250,000 pictures which should hold a lot of time of continual photos. Feel free to check or update my math.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 2 ▼

– QforSweden 2 points 49 days ago +2 / -0

I know my camera can do that, an Olympus OMD EM1 mkII, I belive my panasonic GH6 can as well, but I have only done it with the former.