Really, you were able to tell that when no useful information was given in testimony?
Please post here the exact parts of testimony that made it clear to you.
BTW - I think like you, that they definitely were involved, but I did not hear anything in the testimony today that either strengthened or weakened my belief..
The Secret Service specifically ignored the single most obvious threat point on top of the building. They also classified the kid with a range find as suspicious rather than a threat on multiple encounters. She said he was only suspicious when caught with the range finder in the high threat area. Then again only suspicious during a second encounter in the same area. Finally, she said a man crawling around on the roof is only suspicious and not a threat and that is why the secret service did not interrupt the rally.
Really, you were able to tell that when no useful information was given in testimony?
Please post here the exact parts of testimony that made it clear to you.
BTW - I think like you, that they definitely were involved, but I did not hear anything in the testimony today that either strengthened or weakened my belief..
The Secret Service specifically ignored the single most obvious threat point on top of the building. They also classified the kid with a range find as suspicious rather than a threat on multiple encounters. She said he was only suspicious when caught with the range finder in the high threat area. Then again only suspicious during a second encounter in the same area. Finally, she said a man crawling around on the roof is only suspicious and not a threat and that is why the secret service did not interrupt the rally.
Let's add on to that with the fact that the building in question housed secret service / police / security (sharp shooters).
Yeppers. They had the same line of fire as the shooter/patsy.
Get a Miitary Sniper to take her out . Then state there will be more executions