1
MuckeyDuck 1 point ago +2 / -1

Technically nothing can even touch God's truth because it exist in another dimension entirely.

The only aspect of God's truth that mankind can influence is that truth put into mankind via the holy spirit. That truth cannot be defeated. The manifestation of that truth however can become distorted by way of man's perception of reality.

Of course, I don't actually know precisely what I am talking about here lol, as I am no Aristotle, but I think you might get my drift.

0
MuckeyDuck 0 points ago +1 / -1

Study archive link https://archive.li/kFmqy

What if archive.li is actually controlled by enemy? What if that site was put in place to lure us into haybagging things into it to give false sense of security? What if all that archived stuff can be deleted with the flip of a switch?

Just asking!

3
MuckeyDuck 3 points ago +3 / -0

Someone inside leaks something as a rumor.

A news story develops around rumor.

Candidate is caught off guard, and most totally deny rumor.

I would expect this response.

5
MuckeyDuck 5 points ago +6 / -1

Anybody can make up a little meme with whatever words they want to use.

Do you have source link to story?

0
MuckeyDuck 0 points ago +1 / -1

You say ......didn't see anything like that. I was part of a vip group and we saw Trump arrive and it looked like standard SS.

LOL, Do you really think that your going to see Delta Force operators in action?

No one person our source is accurate about all things. We have to learn to hear a message, extract, and vet what is true, and what is not.

Jones is right about many things.

2
MuckeyDuck 2 points ago +2 / -0

lol look at that guy on the right smiling.

Kamalamadingdong.

Is Willie's Willy the same as Dick's Dick, Peter's Peter, and first cousin to Jacking Jake?

3
MuckeyDuck 3 points ago +3 / -0

Alex Jones in vid I saw yesterday said that Trump has hired private security members that are ex-Delta Force guys. Anyone know if this is true.

I searched internet and could find no info on it.

1
MuckeyDuck 1 point ago +1 / -0

I am always suspicious of anyone that is able to speak, act in ways that are damaging to Intel Industrial complex, and is still alive and seemingly does not fear for their lives.

Something about how freely, openly this Mike Benz is able to operate with no harassment from most powerful group of assassins in the the history of the world bothers me. I don't trust him.

1
MuckeyDuck 1 point ago +1 / -0

Oh what a tangle web we weave when first we practice to deceive.

So you are the final authority on what is and is not a Natural Born Citizen, and there is no room for debate on the subject? What an arrogant asshole'ish approach that is.

2
MuckeyDuck 2 points ago +2 / -0

I think you, this site are misinterpreting what United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 US. 649 actually did rather they what the wording conveyed.

United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898)

In this case, Wong Kim Ark, the son of 2 resident Chinese aliens, claimed U.S. Citizenship and was vindicated by the court on the basis of the 14th Amendment. In this case the Justice Gray gave the opinion of the court. On p. 168-9 of the record, He cites approvingly the decision in Minor vs. Happersett:

At common law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children, born in a country of parents who were its citizens, became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives, or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners.

On the basis of the 14th Amendment, however, the majority opinion coined a new definition for “native citizen”, as anyone who was born in the U.S.A., under the jurisdiction of the United States. The Court gave a novel interpretation to jurisdiction, and thus extended citizenship to all born in the country (excepting those born of ambassadors and foreign armies etc.); but it did not extend the meaning of the term “natural born citizen.”

5
MuckeyDuck 5 points ago +5 / -0

Here is an interesting story from yesterday I was reading that explores simulation theory and ..... I don't agree with pretty much any of it, but it was interesting reading.

1
MuckeyDuck 1 point ago +1 / -0

The Supreme Court of the United States has never applied the term “natural born citizen” to any other category than “those born in the country of parents who are citizens thereof”.

1
MuckeyDuck 1 point ago +1 / -0

Please try and not lead people down the wrong path.

Yes, but it was actually the first 7 presidents, not nine. George Washington, John Adams, Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, James Monroe, John Quincy Adams, and Andrew Jackson.

Martin Van Buren, our eighth president, was born at Kinderhook, New York on December 5, 1782, six years and five months after the Declaration of Independence. Unlike his seven predecessors, he was not just a “citizen,” he was a “natural born” citizen… the first president, at least thirty-five years of age, who was born to US citizen parents after July 4, 1776.

Trumps mother was not a Natural Born Citizen:

Under natural law in late eighteenth-century Europe and America: the father’s blood determined the political allegiance of free persons at birth; the mother was legally irrelevant.

The Supreme Court of the United States has never applied the term “natural born citizen” to any other category than “those born in the country of parents who are citizens thereof”.

1
MuckeyDuck 1 point ago +1 / -0

Not quite correct as I see it:

Yes, but it was actually the first 7 presidents, not nine. George Washington, John Adams, Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, James Monroe, John Quincy Adams, and Andrew Jackson.

Martin Van Buren, our eighth president, was born at Kinderhook, New York on December 5, 1782, six years and five months after the Declaration of Independence. Unlike his seven predecessors, he was not just a “citizen,” he was a “natural born” citizen… the first president, at least thirty-five years of age, who was born to US citizen parents after July 4, 1776.

Trumps mother was not a Natural Born Citizen:

Under natural law in late eighteenth-century Europe and America: the father’s blood determined the political allegiance of free persons at birth; the mother was legally irrelevant.

The Supreme Court of the United States has never applied the term “natural born citizen” to any other category than “those born in the country of parents who are citizens thereof”.

1
MuckeyDuck 1 point ago +1 / -0

I beg to differ:

Yes, but it was actually the first 7 presidents, not nine. George Washington, John Adams, Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, James Monroe, John Quincy Adams, and Andrew Jackson.

Martin Van Buren, our eighth president, was born at Kinderhook, New York on December 5, 1782, six years and five months after the Declaration of Independence. Unlike his seven predecessors, he was not just a “citizen,” he was a “natural born” citizen… the first president, at least thirty-five years of age, who was born to US citizen parents after July 4, 1776.

Under natural law in late eighteenth-century Europe and America: the father’s blood determined the political allegiance of free persons at birth; the mother was legally irrelevant.

The Supreme Court of the United States has never applied the term “natural born citizen” to any other category than “those born in the country of parents who are citizens thereof”.

1
MuckeyDuck 1 point ago +1 / -0

No reference to Natural Born Citizen in Federalist Papers, but that does not mean their is no supporting reference. I did some research on this yesterday:

Yes, but it was actually the first 7 presidents, not nine. George Washington, John Adams, Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, James Monroe, John Quincy Adams, and Andrew Jackson.

Martin Van Buren, our eighth president, was born at Kinderhook, New York on December 5, 1782, six years and five months after the Declaration of Independence. Unlike his seven predecessors, he was not just a “citizen,” he was a “natural born” citizen… the first president, at least thirty-five years of age, who was born to US citizen parents after July 4, 1776.

Under natural law in late eighteenth-century Europe and America: the father’s blood determined the political allegiance of free persons at birth; the mother was legally irrelevant.

The Supreme Court of the United States has never applied the term “natural born citizen” to any other category than “those born in the country of parents who are citizens thereof”.

5
MuckeyDuck 5 points ago +5 / -0

See here:

The Supreme Court of the United States has never applied the term “natural born citizen” to any other category than “those born in the country of parents who are citizens thereof”.

2
MuckeyDuck 2 points ago +3 / -1

Not true, quite spreading lies please:

Under natural law in late eighteenth-century Europe and America: the father’s blood determined the political allegiance of free persons at birth; the mother was legally irrelevant.

The Supreme Court of the United States has never applied the term “natural born citizen” to any other category than “those born in the country of parents who are citizens thereof”.

1
MuckeyDuck 1 point ago +1 / -0

This was a comment I made yesterday:

Yes, but it was actually the first 7 presidents, not nine. George Washington, John Adams, Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, James Monroe, John Quincy Adams, and Andrew Jackson.

Martin Van Buren, our eighth president, was born at Kinderhook, New York on December 5, 1782, six years and five months after the Declaration of Independence. Unlike his seven predecessors, he was not just a “citizen,” he was a “natural born” citizen… the first president, at least thirty-five years of age, who was born to US citizen parents after July 4, 1776.

I know you knew this, and just made a typo, and it's pissing you off to high heaven lol.

Trumps mother was not a Natural Born Citizen:

I said nothing about a Natural Born Citizen being a person whose parents were also Natural Born Citizens. That a person be a Natural Born Citizen only required that that person's parents be Citizens. And this consideration of parentage was Paternal, not Maternal.

Under natural law in late eighteenth-century Europe and America: the father’s blood determined the political allegiance of free persons at birth; the mother was legally irrelevant.

The Supreme Court of the United States has never applied the term “natural born citizen” to any other category than “those born in the country of parents who are citizens thereof”.

5
MuckeyDuck 5 points ago +5 / -0

GRRRRRRRRRRRRRR Get it right!!

Kamala could not be PRESIDENT unless Biden resigned, or died. She can only be ACTING PRESIDENT. The only way Biden can relinquish President is if he resigns, dies or is outed under 25th amendment.

Biden stated that he was only quitting as candidate, but said he planned to remain as president.

5
MuckeyDuck 5 points ago +5 / -0

Read a old cowboy book about driving cows once.

“Boys, the secret of trailing cattle is never to let your herd know that they are under restraint. Let everything that is done be done voluntarily by the cattle. From the moment you let them off the bed ground in the morning until they are bedded at night, never let a cow take a step, except in the direction of its destination."

Seem to me there is some wisdom in this that can be applied to dealing with people too!

See chapter III paragraph ii https://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/12797/pg12797-images.html

view more: Next ›