If you need me to substantiate that most cops are good but a lot of them aren't I'll have to take you outside of your bubble so you can take a look around.
More onion, and the fact that I 'substantiated my assertion' and all you do is complain about the source as if there aren't more.
You on the other hand Mr. Scrottum have provided nothing so far but bullshit to our little exchange. Take some time to do a little research and you may learn something. Either way, I hope you have a happy and productive GFY.
''Qualified immunity'' is NOT blanket immunity
''lot of them aren't''
Substantiate your assertion.
Explain it to us Professor if you know what Trump is proposing, and please substantiate your explanation with proofs. Here is something I found in a few seconds on the web: ..." Qualified immunity is a judicial doctrine created by the Supreme Court that shields state actors from liability for their misconduct, even when they break the law."... https://www.americanbar.org/groups/public_education/publications/insights-on-law-and-society/volume-21/issue-1/qualified-immunity/
If you need me to substantiate that most cops are good but a lot of them aren't I'll have to take you outside of your bubble so you can take a look around.
''The American Bar''....rigghhht.!
Riddle me this, what can we expect to find when we peel the skin off this onion?
More onion, and the fact that I 'substantiated my assertion' and all you do is complain about the source as if there aren't more.
You on the other hand Mr. Scrottum have provided nothing so far but bullshit to our little exchange. Take some time to do a little research and you may learn something. Either way, I hope you have a happy and productive GFY.
You have substantiated nothing.
You posted: ''I know most cops are good but a lot of them aren't'',
You were asked to substantiate your assertion.
You failed to provide any citation to prove your post.
And as for your GFY, take your own advice.