I told a lefty that Assange said Trump was clean..
and they 'fact-checked' me with a reuters article that says:
ACTUALLY! What Assange actually said about Trump was that it's hard to release anything worse than the stuff that comes out of his mouth!
So basically... yeah, you can take Trump at his word. Assange would love to catch Trump in a lie. But all the worst stuff about him, he's very open about.
Don't you think wikileaks would publish evidence that Trump was lying, even about stormy daniels?
Ask your AI assistant of choice... has wikileaks ever caught Trump in a lie?
Not one.
Lefties still love Assange. Assange still defends Trump.
They just can't put two and two together...
Coincidence? No, not really, but while I can see things being predicted (especially if they were using Looking Glass for instance), the unpredictability of bullets and wind movements is not suggestive of control if you mean the 'white hats' were controlling that aspect. Or were even in charge of anything there. Trumps head would have been blown off if he hadn't moved it a split second before the bullet went past and you can't control for that.
those things are not unpredictable to looking glass. you're right that its based on probabilities, but it can absolutely account for what people consider to be 'butterfly effect' and/or 'acts of God'.
these things are not random. they are chaotic to the mundane human mind, but not to a perspective outside of time. the real uncertainty in the predictions made by looking glass are in our thought processes as observers.
This is why Q instructs us over and over and over again to have faith. The plan is not subject to 'wind movements', but it is subject to our collective and individual beliefs.
According to your faith be it unto you.
thank you for encouraging me to verbalize these ideas in this way.
We certainly live in interesting times. :-)
I don't believe it is based on probability, but time travel. Entangled particles within a quantum computer system communication across time, processed by an awakened AI.
It sort of amounts to the 'same thing' that you are saying, if you consider the possibility of alternate, perhaps infinite 'timelines'
what determines which timeline is experienced? it's very accurate prediction, but it isn't written in stone. the variable is consciousness, which is not fully predictable, therefore it is a probability.
again, this is why Q has instructions for us, most of which involve faith and trust. to manage the consciousness variable, and help the predictions stay accurate.