It would be another piece to the criminal puzzle (planes/no-planes) but we aren't at that discussion point yet. We have evidence of explosions and leading theories on it, and research to debunk the official NIST declaration. But there's blockers and gatekeepers in powerful positions, preventing any correction. This is where the battle is now. Unblock so the investigation can be truly done.. but we also have almost 25 years since, so its likely a lot of things have been destroyed to prevent criminal investigation.
I’d love to to have anything you have , I red pilled many using 911 ,, when will America stop eating the lies that they feed them .,I’m so grateful I questioned everything even as a young person . Been awake longer then I can remember ,,
Yeah, because in order to discuss the matter without encountering personal attacks, cognitive dissonance, or rejection, you have to first pierce the thick programmed propaganda with the concept that WTC7 is out of place and that planes alone couldn't have caused the damage. Without having that concept being accepted as "valid or curious enough to warrant further investigation", you simply won't be able to progress to CGI aircraft. I know, because this is the path I followed to wake up.
if there were proven to be no planes, that would be a red herring?
It would be another piece to the criminal puzzle (planes/no-planes) but we aren't at that discussion point yet. We have evidence of explosions and leading theories on it, and research to debunk the official NIST declaration. But there's blockers and gatekeepers in powerful positions, preventing any correction. This is where the battle is now. Unblock so the investigation can be truly done.. but we also have almost 25 years since, so its likely a lot of things have been destroyed to prevent criminal investigation.
the no planes proof is archived... lemme know when ya want it
I’d love to to have anything you have , I red pilled many using 911 ,, when will America stop eating the lies that they feed them .,I’m so grateful I questioned everything even as a young person . Been awake longer then I can remember ,,
when we get to needing to discuss it, after we begin to fix the lies surrounding the event.
Yeah, because in order to discuss the matter without encountering personal attacks, cognitive dissonance, or rejection, you have to first pierce the thick programmed propaganda with the concept that WTC7 is out of place and that planes alone couldn't have caused the damage. Without having that concept being accepted as "valid or curious enough to warrant further investigation", you simply won't be able to progress to CGI aircraft. I know, because this is the path I followed to wake up.