Insight about the "8 shots" from FBI Wray's hearing today (7/24/2024) - The Great Awakening

Insight about the "8 shots" from FBI Wray's hearing today (7/24/2024) 🤔💭 Theory 😲💡

posted 152 days ago by rayw_wwg1wga 152 days ago by rayw_wwg1wga +54 / -0

Sauce: https://x.com/thevivafrei/status/1816137633065554360

Q from Rep Bishop: "Did Crooks fire 8 shots?"

A from Wray: "We have recovered 8 cartridges on the roof"

Takeaways:

Initial reaction was: he's not saying yes or no to whether all 8 shots came from Crooks - so it does not rule out a second or third assassin
Why did he use the term "cartridges" rather than "casings" or "shells"? Because as a law enforcement person, the terminology must be very precise - "cartridge" means something different entirely: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cartridge_(firearms)
If we interpret this as an accident/misspoken and he actually meant casings - then the initial reaction would be correct
If we interpret this as intentional wording, then what he's saying is Crooks didn't fire a single shot since they found intact rounds... (this would add up with the other hints we saw - body cam footage where the gun was far away from his body and it didn't have any blood / blood trails on it, as well as the testimony where officers confronted him on the roof in prone position but "within seconds fired upon Trump" which would be physically impossible - so if that's the case, someone else fired upon Trump)

And Q said "Trust Wray" - perhaps this is a way he found for disclosing the truth?

Thoughts?

12 comments

12 comments share save hide report block hide replies

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q

Comments (12)

sorted by:

▲ 3 ▼

– NOT_ADMIN 3 points 152 days ago +4 / -1

3 shots came a sniper from within the buildings window. These are the shots that hit trump. These are the shots that have no echo.
5 shots came from crooks, these are the shots that have an echo.
1 shot came from the counter sniper.

permalink save report block reply

▲ 4 ▼

– floridafrog 4 points 152 days ago +4 / -0

They never follow up with the right questions....

permalink parent save report block reply

– rayw_wwg1wga [S] 3 points 152 days ago +3 / -0

That's what most of us thought. However, based on how we interpret Wray's testimony (the last line), it's possible all 8 came from real assassin(s) rather than Crooks where he didn't fire a single shot.

The other data point we know is "2 snipers were stationed in the 2nd floor window" from yesterday's hearing: https://greatawakening.win/p/17tebpNYM0/todays-congressional-hearing-723/c/.