I don't think the angle is right from where Trump was speaking. To me, there was nobody on the water tower. The photos of "someone" on the tower are just digital artifacts on the shadow of the side of the dome. When you zoom in on a digital photo, the camera pixelates trying to increase the size of the image by introducing pixels. If the shooter was on the tower, he would have hit Trump in the right side of his head and not skimmed the right ear. The angle is off by 20 or more degrees from Crooks position. The second shooter had to be somewhere to the right of Crooks for the correct angle. Maybe the second story window. Jus sayin
I saw a video (I think it was john cullen on X) that the water tower lines up with a shot along the back row of bleachers behind Trump. Shows evidence of bullet path. https://x.com/I_Am_JohnCullen
I don't think the angle is right from where Trump was speaking. To me, there was nobody on the water tower. The photos of "someone" on the tower are just digital artifacts on the shadow of the side of the dome. When you zoom in on a digital photo, the camera pixelates trying to increase the size of the image by introducing pixels. If the shooter was on the tower, he would have hit Trump in the right side of his head and not skimmed the right ear. The angle is off by 20 or more degrees from Crooks position. The second shooter had to be somewhere to the right of Crooks for the correct angle. Maybe the second story window. Jus sayin
I saw a video (I think it was john cullen on X) that the water tower lines up with a shot along the back row of bleachers behind Trump. Shows evidence of bullet path. https://x.com/I_Am_JohnCullen
actually from the trees rather than the water tower. Look at the link. Lots of info.