I will preface this posting by stating that these are only some of my opinions, and as such, much of what I am posting is based on speculation. There is scant evidence to back up some of my opinions but, with a little luck, I believe that in the coming days/weeks we will see more evidence to either support, or refute some of the opinions I now hold.

][
There is a lot to chew on surrounding the attempted J13 assassination, and ongoing investigations- and that is an understatement. But, the stench of a massive conspiracy, and coverup wafts throughout all of it.

I posted this thread a couple days ago. https://greatawakening.win/p/17tegX8zLM/i-have-a-problem-with-the-narrat/

After further considering the events of J13, I believe that what we are looking at is a botched, organized assassination attempt.

And, I believe that the primary event that led to the failure of that organized assassination attempt is hinged on the actions of the "municipal officers" who found, and confronted Crooks. Their actions, boosting onto the roof, and radioing in Crooks' location is what started the unraveling of a carefully constructed, and organized assassination plot. They were the catalyst's of Chaos Theory that helped to foil a carefully planned, and organized assassination plot.

I am going to try to keep this post as short as possible, so forgive me if I do not venture into too many details here. I will just briefly summarize some of the key elements that I believe (in my speculative opinion) fit into the notion that a widespread, and highly organized conspiracy is currently at work surrounding the events of J13.

•Crooks as a lone gunman is a complete lie.

•2 different vehicles are confirmed associated with J13 shooter('s). Hyundai Sonata, and a bicycle. Also, unconfirmed reports of a 3rd vehicle, a van.

This fact alone lends itself to the idea of 2 conspirators, and possibly 3, or more. All govt. officials in congressional hearings dodge, obfuscate, or otherwise try to bullshit whenever questioned about vehicles; also, no specific details surrounding vehicles have been provided.

•Audio evidence. It does not match up with the idea of 1 gun, 1 shooter= 8 shots. The naked human ear can hear what sounds like 3 different guns firing a total of 9 shots PLUS 1 final sound (that sounds just like a gun shot) roughly ~20 seconds after the the first 9, for what sounds like 10 shots fired in total, throughput the event.

Again, govt. officials have not been forthcoming with any kind of audio forensics data, nor have they even provided a plausible explanation for the J13 gun sounds that everyone on planet earth can hear, and estimate conclusions that vary from the official "Crooks took 8 shots" narrative.

•Where did all of these different names of "the alleged shooter" come from, and why has nobody from the govt. asked about these other people?

•First name that I recall hitting the media, alleging an identification for "the" shooter was "Mark Violets." How did that happen; how did they get that wrong; has anyone investigated to be certain that this Mark Violets person was not part of a wider conspiracy? ... Lots more questions about that...

What about that Maxwell Yearick guy? I see lots of "thoroughly debunked, cuz FIB said Crooks was shooter" in my internet searches for info on that allegedly "missing" person.

And then there is that other Crooks fellow. who we all assume is just some coincidental troll.

There is more to the alleged shooter name-game, shell-game that has swirled around the J13 event, but I will abbreviate by simply stating that there are some peculiar inconsistencies regarding the name thing; how Crooks was identified allegedly through DNA, etc.

•The abandoned window counter-sniper post in the building right behind Crooks. I'm not sure if many of you reading this are aware that those 2 officers are so far unaccounted for at the time of the shooting. Where exactly were they when shots were fired? Where is the confirmation to prove that they are not lying about "abandoned post to look for shooter, comrade"? How can we confirm they were not in the window when shots were fired?... ... Oh, that's right, we CANNOT CONFIRM THAT AFTER TWO WEEKS! Unacceptable.

From the totality of everything I have researched so far, my gut is telling me that there were at least 2, or maybe 3 actual, professional snipers involved with the plot. In addition, I believe that there were 2, or 3 patsy's also involved with the plot.

Unbeknownst to them, their (the patsy's) only part of the plot was to be killed by a counter-sniper, and get blamed for an assassination. The patsy's wouldn't have even needed to fire a shot to fulfill their purpose in the plot, had everything gone according to plan, which it did not.

•Crooks was a patsy. One of the real snipers was in a window behind Crooks, disguised (or otherwise infiltrated) as an official counter-sniper. Real sniper was supposed to cap Trump, then put a bullet in the back of Crook's head. Blame Crooks, and take credit for killing Crooks too. How convenient.

-But keep in mind- When local cops climbed that roof and spotted Crooks, the plot went sideways. The real sniper knew that his patsy was going to be killed within seconds of the municipal (local) cops finding Crooks. That's when we hear the real window sniper take his shot...and miss...and take 2 more shots. Audio evidence confirms the first 3 shot salvo sounding different from the next 5 shots, which were presumably from Crooks.

•Maxwell Yearick was/is likely a patsy as well. I am getting more into speculative territory here, but I believe Yearick was a patsy (distraction) for a second real sniper, who was likely positioned on top of the water tower. My theory is that Yearick's role in the plot was similar to Crooks' role- he was just going to take a bullet from one of the counter-snipers and get blamed.

-However, keep in mind- When the municipal offers spotted Crooks on the roof, the plot went to hell. I do not think that the tower sniper was in position yet to fire. When Crooks fired, it was too soon- he wasn't supposed to shoot, he was just there to eat a bullet.
Tower sniper realized that the plan was busted, and quickly decided to abort his mission, vacating the tower without shooting. This left patsy "Yearick as a loose end." Anyone seen Yearick lately? Nah, I didn't think so.

•Mark Violets was likely a patsy as well. Was he a patsy for a 3rd potential assassin? I don't know, but I think it's possible.

&>< I will cut this post here. I hope this raises some questions for some of you out there, and that ideas circulated here will lead to some answers for the many, many questions we all have. Thanks for reading, and good hunting.

{edit} I have added a video link from my prior thread here, with timestamps listed.

Full video of the oversight hearing: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ONvdo2f8u84 Relevant time stamps begin around (+/- 5 mins.) 1:47, 2:30, 3:35, 4:15