"Roger, Maxwell Yearick's dad, worked on the collapsible AR-15 for the Navy at Carderock Navy Surface Warfare Center. That was used by Crooks and Yearick at the assassination..." https://x.com/RealGeorgeWebb1/status/1818047716754444579
George Webb's whole front page is full of Yearick diggs right now. It may be worth going through - https://x.com/RealGeorgeWebb1
What REALLY blows my mind about this is how both Crooks and Yearick have distinctive features which match the dead guy. Crooks has the spikey ears, and Yearick has the gauges. Their facial structures basically match. The hair color basically matches.
I still think the guy we saw dead was Crooks, as gauges can be had by anybody while the shape of an ear is unique.
Crooks is in a BlackRock commercial, while Yearick's family are tight with the Cheneys!
Then there's the entire side-show of the Twitter troll @jewgazing who looks exactly like the shooter on the roof, yet is not him, but MSM world-wide reported him as him, meanwhile he's just meme'ing it up and laughing his ass off; also, the INITIAL report was that it was some Antifa guy named Mark Violets, who turned out to be an Italian Soccer commentator on YouTube, but we can probably discard these aspects for this discussion.
How TF do we end up with two candidates for the dead shooter who both fit, and yet don't? What a psyop this seems to be. I wonder if this same 'confusion template' was used after the JFK assassination, or perhaps even other high-profile hits, to throw the public a few harmless bones and keep them busy arguing in the fog?
I would really like to know why in the world we were shown a fat antifa dude for the first few hours. Where in TF did that come from? And then everyone just changed stories and never mentioned it again.
Totally agree, I just think it's weird that it was excusable since nobody from any side seems to say anything about it. That's a clear indication they're full of it. I certainly shook my head and disregarded it. Just odd that some folks give are ok with BS up front and don't realize it's to splinter the actual investigation. Anyways. Onward.
from https://x.com/RealGeorgeWebb1/status/1818317137565679772
document https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CREC-2018-01-17/pdf/CREC-2018-01-17-pt1-PgE51-6.pdf
"Roger, Maxwell Yearick's dad, worked on the collapsible AR-15 for the Navy at Carderock Navy Surface Warfare Center. That was used by Crooks and Yearick at the assassination..." https://x.com/RealGeorgeWebb1/status/1818047716754444579
So let me get this straight: The other prime shooter suspect's family are friends with the Cheneys, who are tied to USSS Director Kimberly Cheatle from the 9/11 era. (https://search.brave.com/search?q=kim+cheatle+dick+cheney)
Also see: https://x.com/WallStreetApes/status/1817563191985274932 - "Owner of the white van towed after the assassination attempt linked to Arizona. He’s also tied to an Arizona company called Yearick Armory Explosives"
George Webb's whole front page is full of Yearick diggs right now. It may be worth going through - https://x.com/RealGeorgeWebb1
What REALLY blows my mind about this is how both Crooks and Yearick have distinctive features which match the dead guy. Crooks has the spikey ears, and Yearick has the gauges. Their facial structures basically match. The hair color basically matches.
I still think the guy we saw dead was Crooks, as gauges can be had by anybody while the shape of an ear is unique.
Crooks is in a BlackRock commercial, while Yearick's family are tight with the Cheneys!
Then there's the entire side-show of the Twitter troll @jewgazing who looks exactly like the shooter on the roof, yet is not him, but MSM world-wide reported him as him, meanwhile he's just meme'ing it up and laughing his ass off; also, the INITIAL report was that it was some Antifa guy named Mark Violets, who turned out to be an Italian Soccer commentator on YouTube, but we can probably discard these aspects for this discussion.
How TF do we end up with two candidates for the dead shooter who both fit, and yet don't? What a psyop this seems to be. I wonder if this same 'confusion template' was used after the JFK assassination, or perhaps even other high-profile hits, to throw the public a few harmless bones and keep them busy arguing in the fog?
I would really like to know why in the world we were shown a fat antifa dude for the first few hours. Where in TF did that come from? And then everyone just changed stories and never mentioned it again.
Totally agree, I just think it's weird that it was excusable since nobody from any side seems to say anything about it. That's a clear indication they're full of it. I certainly shook my head and disregarded it. Just odd that some folks give are ok with BS up front and don't realize it's to splinter the actual investigation. Anyways. Onward.
But wasn't it the local Butler Co police who released that name? OANN and others reported it that way I believe.
Yes they did. The real question becomes how the Butler PD got that guys info as a suspect and how tf did they publish it?? So blatantly false