If you're one who thinks this is all "coincidence" then this post is not for you.
Just go back to sleep.
A few years ago Amazon made a documentary called "TimeTravel 0" about John Titor.
In it they tried to make John Titor's's warnings all about Iran when the word "Iran" is never mentioned a single time in over 300 pages of John Titor's posts in 2000 and 2001. His warnings were all about China with subtle allusions to the [Synagogue of Satan].
Think about what that means.
Perhaps they see John Titor's information as a threat. Why else would they expend ammunition?
John Titor ~Feb 2001: "Yes in 2036 there are a great many people who believe the book of Revelation played out... and that Christ returned." "If or when Christ returns, do you think he will be a lamb or a LION?"
WHY would someone from the near future make a statement like that? ⬆️
WHY???
What would he have had to witness?
Luckily I'm not on here to make friends, but soon many will come to the ultimate conclusion on their own and it will be hard to deny.
"The truth is not for all men, but only for those who seek it."
Edit: posted by John Titor in 2001:
"There are two real issues I hope people think about when I’m gone. One, how will you react when another time traveler shows up and two, how are we going to handle the responsibility of time travel when it's invented."
Qkitty?
He predicts a Civil War in 2005 leading to a WWIII scenario in 2015. As neither of those things came true, does it really make sense to believe anything he says, either? Just curious. Thanks!
Thank you u/nuimflow for asking a question rather than just naysaying. And it is a valid question.
The best way to explain it is to compare it to many of Q's posts where he says something BIG is about to happen etc. etc. but then nothing BIG happened.
Now we've come to understand that many of Q's posts are peppered with statements/predictions that were meant to be future deltas. Ex: "Something BIG is about to drop." Etc. etc...
John Titer also explained that there are an infinite number of timelines (google Everett Wheeler model). He said that even though similar/nearly identical occurrences happen across timelines, some timelines are lagging in relation to others, sometimes by years.
I do not think our timeline is destined for the same level of nuclear decimation that he experienced on his. He said as much in his posts.
Fun fact: Q started posting 3 days away from 17 years to the day after John Titor did.
"Yes, because the causes of everything he mentioned hold true today"
Thanks for pointing that out Donnie.
Clearly you've read some of JT's posts.
Anybody who has thoroughly read JT's posts will realize this guy clearly knew something because he spoke about cultural and political concepts that nobody could've predicted we would be experiencing today.
I read all of those threads religiously probably about 20 years ago. {Or whenever the original threads were online}
I seem to remember him mentioning DC being bombed by Russia {I believe someone here in a prior thread corrected me and it was China}, but the citizens of the USA were for it, not against it. Or something alluding to that. That always stuck with me.
u/#q4495 u/#q4101 u/#q4283
If you're one who thinks this is all "coincidence" then this post is not for you.
Just go back to sleep.
A few years ago Amazon made a documentary called "TimeTravel 0" about John Titor.
In it they tried to make John Titor's's warnings all about Iran when the word "Iran" is never mentioned a single time in over 300 pages of John Titor's posts in 2000 and 2001. His warnings were all about China with subtle allusions to the [Synagogue of Satan].
Think about what that means.
Perhaps they see John Titor's information as a threat. Why else would they expend ammunition?
John Titor ~Feb 2001:
"Yes in 2036 there are a great many people who believe the book of Revelation played out... and that Christ returned."
"If or when Christ returns, do you think he will be a lamb or a LION?"
WHY would someone from the near future make a statement like that? ⬆️
WHY???
What would he have had to witness?
Luckily I'm not on here to make friends, but soon many will come to the ultimate conclusion on their own and it will be hard to deny.
"The truth is not for all men, but only for those who seek it."
The Titor posts:
https://temporalrecon.wordpress.com/the-titor-posts/
Edit: posted by John Titor in 2001: "There are two real issues I hope people think about when I’m gone. One, how will you react when another time traveler shows up and two, how are we going to handle the responsibility of time travel when it's invented."
Qkitty?
He predicts a Civil War in 2005 leading to a WWIII scenario in 2015. As neither of those things came true, does it really make sense to believe anything he says, either? Just curious. Thanks!
Thank you u/nuimflow for asking a question rather than just naysaying. And it is a valid question.
The best way to explain it is to compare it to many of Q's posts where he says something BIG is about to happen etc. etc. but then nothing BIG happened.
Now we've come to understand that many of Q's posts are peppered with statements/predictions that were meant to be future deltas. Ex: "Something BIG is about to drop." Etc. etc...
John Titer also explained that there are an infinite number of timelines (google Everett Wheeler model). He said that even though similar/nearly identical occurrences happen across timelines, some timelines are lagging in relation to others, sometimes by years.
I do not think our timeline is destined for the same level of nuclear decimation that he experienced on his. He said as much in his posts.
Fun fact: Q started posting 3 days away from 17 years to the day after John Titor did.
Yes, because the causes of everything he mentioned hold true today
uDonny_Fiasco
Thanks for pointing that out Donnie.
Clearly you've read some of JT's posts.
Anybody who has thoroughly read JT's posts will realize this guy clearly knew something because he spoke about cultural and political concepts that nobody could've predicted we would be experiencing today.
I read all of those threads religiously probably about 20 years ago. {Or whenever the original threads were online}
I seem to remember him mentioning DC being bombed by Russia {I believe someone here in a prior thread corrected me and it was China}, but the citizens of the USA were for it, not against it. Or something alluding to that. That always stuck with me.