i believe that Thomas Crooks was INTENDED as the patsy, but the body is Yearick's. After Yearick was shot, they pretended that it was Crooks, meanwhile Yearick is reported missing and Crooks has posted YouTube videos of himself since then...
Well i think they didn't count on Yearick being shot, but that he was supposed to get away, and then later there would start a manhunt for Crooks on the MSM, comparable to Lee Harvey Oswald.
So when Yearick was shot, they had a problem, so they stuck with the original plan of blaming their prepared patsy by sticking the name of Crooks on the dead Yearick's body.
So could the kid shoot or not? ROTC story was bunk I’m guessing? I thought any target this kid shot at could be sold as new?
Doesn't matter if he could shoot,he was just the patsy to end the investigation.
They needed a dead body, and he fit the bill.
My question was a frame for the ever changing narrative.
i believe that Thomas Crooks was INTENDED as the patsy, but the body is Yearick's. After Yearick was shot, they pretended that it was Crooks, meanwhile Yearick is reported missing and Crooks has posted YouTube videos of himself since then...
That could be,they just needed a dead body to show on camera.
Well i think they didn't count on Yearick being shot, but that he was supposed to get away, and then later there would start a manhunt for Crooks on the MSM, comparable to Lee Harvey Oswald.
So when Yearick was shot, they had a problem, so they stuck with the original plan of blaming their prepared patsy by sticking the name of Crooks on the dead Yearick's body.