Would anyone be interested in learning how to make better arguments in support of Q?
I've been thinking about this for a while, and I believe it could really help in convincing normies.
To clarify, I'm not trying to criticize anyone or present myself as a great debater. I just see a need and believe this is the best way I can contribute to the group.
Objective: To help other Anons improve their arguments, which could assist in persuading skeptics.
How:
- Identify common logical fallacies and explain how to avoid them.
- Provide practice opportunities by role-playing as a skeptical normie.
Please let me know if you're interested and feel free to contribute your own tips and insights that you believe can help the community.
I dont convince people of Q,just red pill them.
Is that something that you see actually making a change in what they think, though?
What exactly are you doing to redpill them? Are you sending them screengrabs of some random Tweet?
Because that's a lot of what I'm seeing and is the reason why I think it's important for people to learn how to make arguments in support of Q.