Would anyone be interested in learning how to make better arguments in support of Q?
I've been thinking about this for a while, and I believe it could really help in convincing normies.
To clarify, I'm not trying to criticize anyone or present myself as a great debater. I just see a need and believe this is the best way I can contribute to the group.
Objective: To help other Anons improve their arguments, which could assist in persuading skeptics.
How:
- Identify common logical fallacies and explain how to avoid them.
- Provide practice opportunities by role-playing as a skeptical normie.
Please let me know if you're interested and feel free to contribute your own tips and insights that you believe can help the community.
Is that something that you see actually making a change in what they think, though?
What exactly are you doing to redpill them? Are you sending them screengrabs of some random Tweet?
Because that's a lot of what I'm seeing and is the reason why I think it's important for people to learn how to make arguments in support of Q.