Would anyone be interested in learning how to make better arguments in support of Q?
I've been thinking about this for a while, and I believe it could really help in convincing normies.
To clarify, I'm not trying to criticize anyone or present myself as a great debater. I just see a need and believe this is the best way I can contribute to the group.
Objective: To help other Anons improve their arguments, which could assist in persuading skeptics.
How:
- Identify common logical fallacies and explain how to avoid them.
- Provide practice opportunities by role-playing as a skeptical normie.
Please let me know if you're interested and feel free to contribute your own tips and insights that you believe can help the community.
Ok, see. This is an example of what I'm talking about.
I asked if anyone would be interested in learning tipsnin how to make better arguments, and the majority of responses so far are people listing reasons why they think it won't work.
Assuming that all normies behave/think the same way is a problem right there.
Defeatist attitudes don't help. Instead of finding positive ways to improve things, time and energy is being sucked up by all these arguments against it.
If you're not interested, then fine. It's not going to be forced on you. Why the need to try to squash anyone else's efforts, though?
LOL. Temper thy defensiveness.
We are interested enough to reply to your thread. Now there's something.
I fully admit that I need help as well. I know I'm far from great at this. Buy it's more frustration than defensiveness, just to be accurate.
OK. So let's Gooo.