Would anyone be interested in learning how to make better arguments in support of Q?
I've been thinking about this for a while, and I believe it could really help in convincing normies.
To clarify, I'm not trying to criticize anyone or present myself as a great debater. I just see a need and believe this is the best way I can contribute to the group.
Objective: To help other Anons improve their arguments, which could assist in persuading skeptics.
How:
- Identify common logical fallacies and explain how to avoid them.
- Provide practice opportunities by role-playing as a skeptical normie.
Please let me know if you're interested and feel free to contribute your own tips and insights that you believe can help the community.
Awesome! I'm so glad that you see what I'm seeing.
I like your idea about a weekly post. It could be something that's coming up in current events, or something that sticks out in conversations here that could be used as examples.
hey, whatever you want your lesson plan to look like. you're the one taking the initiative