Iran has just had an election, and the new president does not want a war that will destabilize and impoverish the nation, I mean he is a fresh face, so prolly wants to start out right - AND Iran has just joined BRICS, so there are the stabilizing 'other nations' wo don't want a world war that will destroy everythins, either. So Iran are taking this response very slowly and deliberately. Yes, they have the right to retaliate, but they do not want to escalate. So how then? Also, if they do nothing, they will give the Israelis carte blanche to go ahead and murder some more people on Iranian soil, so that's not an option. The ISraelis obvio want some really aggressive response so that they can rope in the backing from the stupid USA, who will fork out.
Meanwhile Iranians are playing a game, whereby they launch political speach and warnings at Israel, as is approproate. REEEeeeEEE, all the puppets are dancing.
What constitutes a 'major'[ attack anyway? Assassination is not major, then, is it? In that eye-for-an-eye scenario, a couple of Israelis will be assassinated (although I doubt that Iran even wants to do that), and that would be acceptable, as an even-handed response? I doubt that as well, as Israeli blood is deemed more important that goyim blood.
So, as stated, the word is IF. And that's part of the psyop.
The most important word in this diatribe is IF
Iran has just had an election, and the new president does not want a war that will destabilize and impoverish the nation, I mean he is a fresh face, so prolly wants to start out right - AND Iran has just joined BRICS, so there are the stabilizing 'other nations' wo don't want a world war that will destroy everythins, either. So Iran are taking this response very slowly and deliberately. Yes, they have the right to retaliate, but they do not want to escalate. So how then? Also, if they do nothing, they will give the Israelis carte blanche to go ahead and murder some more people on Iranian soil, so that's not an option. The ISraelis obvio want some really aggressive response so that they can rope in the backing from the stupid USA, who will fork out.
Meanwhile Iranians are playing a game, whereby they launch political speach and warnings at Israel, as is approproate. REEEeeeEEE, all the puppets are dancing.
What constitutes a 'major'[ attack anyway? Assassination is not major, then, is it? In that eye-for-an-eye scenario, a couple of Israelis will be assassinated (although I doubt that Iran even wants to do that), and that would be acceptable, as an even-handed response? I doubt that as well, as Israeli blood is deemed more important that goyim blood.
So, as stated, the word is IF. And that's part of the psyop.
Amen , if is wishful thinking on his part.