What I'm saying is why did they release this without all of the evidence? It's all out there, but they failed to include a single piece in this report, it's a rush job that will get blown off by everyone who needs to read it.
The evidence they point to is Hunter saying "10% for the Big Guy" but in the next sentence Jim Jordan even says he doesn't really know who the Big Guy is, they're assuming it is Big Joe. That's bullshit.
I just read through this, when it comes to the evidence part, they just skip over it, wtf are they doing, it's all out in the open and available
Exactly, they can not put the genie back in the bottle.
What I'm saying is why did they release this without all of the evidence? It's all out there, but they failed to include a single piece in this report, it's a rush job that will get blown off by everyone who needs to read it.
The evidence they point to is Hunter saying "10% for the Big Guy" but in the next sentence Jim Jordan even says he doesn't really know who the Big Guy is, they're assuming it is Big Joe. That's bullshit.
We did have a while back where it was made known the Big Guy was Buyden.
Then why didn't Jim Jordan show that instead of saying that it was just a guess?