The problem has nothing to do with the AI. I'm just suggesting that you cite it.

When someone makes an unconditional statement that later turns out to be conditional... and the condition isn't met... that means the statement was false. that means the number of false statements allowed to be spoken by a prophet is more than zero, according to the Bible.

I am not the one committing logical fallacies or intellectual dishonesty here.

Your AI did fine work. and proved you wrong. Jonah's statement was only revealed to be conditional after hidden conditions were not met. Therefore you cannot judge a prophet based on the strict condition that 100% of their statements come to pass. This was my original position.