I am always confused by the climate models. The article claims there are 100+. If we assume there are just 100, do they all say exactly the same thing?
If so then why do we need 100?
If not then doesn't that mean that at least 99 of them are wrong?
Perversely, I think I am dealing with a band of lying toe-rags who will use their hottest running models to scare the sheeple and then, when the models are challenged, they will fall back on one closer to reality and use that as an example of models working perfectly.
I am always confused by the climate models. The article claims there are 100+. If we assume there are just 100, do they all say exactly the same thing?
If so then why do we need 100? If not then doesn't that mean that at least 99 of them are wrong?
....what you are dealing with is referred to as "Degrees (mathematical not temperature) Of Accuracy "...
Perversely, I think I am dealing with a band of lying toe-rags who will use their hottest running models to scare the sheeple and then, when the models are challenged, they will fall back on one closer to reality and use that as an example of models working perfectly.
But that's just me ... !
...you are sniffing around the right rabbit holes...