You are not reading what i am saying. Being shot from the front is not only consistent with entry wounds in the back of the head, it would be expected. A third wound from the front would only be one more wound. I don't see that it explodes any theory of anything.
By the way, I used to be a member of the International Wound Ballistics Association. Their journal once conducted an independent analysis of the government report of the Kennedy assassination and concluded that the given conclusions were correct based on the forensic evidence. There were a number of peculiarities that were resolved on deeper analysis.
The one Doctor stood still by his claim later.
You are not reading what i am saying. Being shot from the front is not only consistent with entry wounds in the back of the head, it would be expected. A third wound from the front would only be one more wound. I don't see that it explodes any theory of anything.
By the way, I used to be a member of the International Wound Ballistics Association. Their journal once conducted an independent analysis of the government report of the Kennedy assassination and concluded that the given conclusions were correct based on the forensic evidence. There were a number of peculiarities that were resolved on deeper analysis.
I was only pointing out the Doctor still stood his ground later on. Despite pressure from SS to change his medical opinion.
That's not good, of course. But it leaves the whole subject in mystery.
Pretty clear who wants evidence destroyed and that is not normally the good guys. For those awake we have seen this in the past.