FCC REFUSES FUNDS FOR STARLINK - After SpaceX won a bid for $885 million to deploy low-latency internet service to 642,925 locations in 35 states, the FCC has denied Starlink the funds, claiming they can’t prove they have the ability to provide the service. - The Great Awakening

FCC REFUSES FUNDS FOR STARLINK - After SpaceX won a bid for $885 million to deploy low-latency internet service to 642,925 locations in 35 states, the FCC has denied Starlink the funds, claiming they can’t prove they have the ability to provide the service. (media.greatawakening.win)

posted 85 days ago by catsfive 85 days ago by catsfive +173 / -0

32 comments download

32 comments share download save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (32)

sorted by:

▲ 3 ▼

– FiveDogs 3 points 85 days ago +3 / -0

Sounds like a great investment opportunity. One billion raised privately, which means no government strings to be pulled.

This is a blessing. Like $40/ family, and it would all go to Starlink instead of 80% syphoned off by the government.

permalink save report block reply

▲ 1 ▼

– HonestBobbin 1 point 85 days ago +1 / -0

Starlink is only $40/mo? I thought their price has gone up to $120 (it was $99 a few years ago IIRC)

https://www.starlink.com/service-plans

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 2 ▼

– Karmlik 2 points 85 days ago +2 / -0

Yeah. Mines 120.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 1 ▼

– FiveDogs 1 point 84 days ago +1 / -0

$40.00 one time investment, like buying stock to fund the project privately.

permalink parent save report block reply

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q