The entire thing that this is about TENET / Rubin etc is speculation.
Even if we assume this speculation for a second as real, the cooperating part is not speculation but rather faulty logic.
Omission of someone's name on the public indictment does not imply cooperation. Names can be omitted if they have other entities being targeted that they believe will be interfered with.
The entire thing that this is about TENET / Rubin etc is speculation.
I don't think that's the case. There's enough identifying information in the indictment. They described TENET using the exact language TENET uses on their website And other details in the indictment line up. Tim Pool and Benny Johnson has issued statements that they basically are victims and were not aware of where the money was coming from. Pool, Johnson and Rubin are not implicated in crimes.
the cooperating part is not speculation but rather faulty logic.
Names in indictments are always omitted if they are not the person being charged with a crime.
The logic behind guessing they are cooperating is because there's a ton of information in the indictment about what they did and what they knew. They knew they were working with Russian money and hid that from the people they were hiring for TENET
So the question becomes why were they not indicted?
The DOJ Indictment that involves TENET media thing is going to have a lot of people talking to their lawyers
Just saw this on Twitter The DOJ doesn't name tenet media and it's founders were not charged. Are they cooperating?
Talking about this: https://www.dailydot.com/debug/russia-tenet-benny-johnson-tim-pool-indictment/
Sounds like just speculation.
The government dropped 2 indictments and the sanctions today. It was a coordinated thing.
RT got sanctioned and two RT employees got indicted.
Which part sounds like speculation? The cooperating?
That's definitely a guess.
The entire thing that this is about TENET / Rubin etc is speculation.
Even if we assume this speculation for a second as real, the cooperating part is not speculation but rather faulty logic.
Omission of someone's name on the public indictment does not imply cooperation. Names can be omitted if they have other entities being targeted that they believe will be interfered with.
I don't think that's the case. There's enough identifying information in the indictment. They described TENET using the exact language TENET uses on their website And other details in the indictment line up. Tim Pool and Benny Johnson has issued statements that they basically are victims and were not aware of where the money was coming from. Pool, Johnson and Rubin are not implicated in crimes.
Names in indictments are always omitted if they are not the person being charged with a crime.
The logic behind guessing they are cooperating is because there's a ton of information in the indictment about what they did and what they knew. They knew they were working with Russian money and hid that from the people they were hiring for TENET
So the question becomes why were they not indicted?