I am just curious on your alls opinion on the father being charged with murder? Isn’t what he did AT WORST accessory or something? I guess they will say he clearly knew and provided the gun intending the murders occur. I guess I am just curious why he’s charged with murder when the 14 year old is the one who committed murder. Is there actual precedent for this or are they warping the law the fit their agenda? What is next, you loan out a car to someone and they run a crowd over now your a murderer? LOL!
Edit: my main concern in all of this is just the dangerous legal precedent. Who decided the gun was bought for the kid, why did the FBI not do anything, etc
This is my main point; Charge him with something that at least makes sense, accessory, or some crime of enabling but now 2 people are charged with murder?
I don’t think the father should be charged. he’s not responsible for his son, taking a gun from their home and using it to shoot other people. With your logic, we’re getting into red flag laws, and those are equally as sinister as gun control.
Why should the father be charged? if that’s the case, then every black kid out there who kills their parents should be charged as well! What about all the parents of illegal aliens who commit crimes, should they be charged to? It’s a slippery slope when you want to charge someone else, for the actions of another.
This is exactly what they did to that Durov Telegram dude in France. they’re trying to blame him for the crimes of somebody that used his platform.
It’s communism and socialism!