Yawn... obviously faked
(www.bbc.co.uk)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (100)
sorted by:
It is obvious that you've never used even a simple dslr camera with interchangeable lenses. Get one, learn what ISO and f stop is and how it affects the outcome of the shot. Then things will start making sense.
Imagine nailing perfectly focused shots every time while wearing snow gloves and a motorcycle helmet.
If you are talking about the Apollo missions, then make a post about the apollo missions. We are talking about SpaceX, here and now.
With all due respect, the title of the post "obviously faked" harkens to other well known fakes.
A sensitive topic for you?
Thats got nothing to do with autofocus and zoom capabilities on a suit integral camera.
It has everything to do with it. You clearly don't know how a camera works either. Go outside in the daytime and try to take pictures of the stars. Let me know how that goes.
Whats taking pictures of the skies in daytime got to do with ISO, apertures interchangeable lenses and shutter speeds?
The completely black space is very strange. I am curious to hear what others think about that. My assumption is that you would see many, many stars, the same as we do on dark nights away from city lights.
Why is the space so black without any stars? Any astrologists care to explain?
Learn how cameras work. Stars are very faint. Right objects however blow up the cameras exposure balance forcing it to choose between keeping extremely bright objects like the nearby spaceship in proper exposure, but it then creates shutter times so fast that the camera cannot capture the Stars
If someone pointed the camera away from the bright objects and let the camera do its thing, you would indeed get Stars
What's interesting is that no astronaut that ever landed on the moon ever thought of photographing the night sky or was instructed to do so.
Look at the Hubble deep field images. They pointed HST at a pitch black postage stamp-sized point in the sky and left the shutter open for 10 DAYS to gather as much light as possible. What we see from the ground, at night, is just blackness. No look up an image of Hubble deep field and you'll see what is really there.
Thank you, cats. I have always wanted to have a much better understanding of cameras. I'm pretty much a point and shoot and hope for the best type. But being a master photographer would be very cool.
You would think if you make the trip all the way to the edge of space you would take multiple videos and pictures to show the grandeur. Maybe they did. Maybe I missed them.
The city lights - thats your answer right there. Go outside and tell me if you can see stars in the daylight. You can't see stars because they are thousands of times dimmer than the sun. Why? Because they are thousands of times further away than the sun. The atmospheric scatter really has nothing to do with how bright or dim something is.
The spacewalk happened on the day side of the orbit so they could see what they are doing.
Thanks for this response. I think that is just what I was looking for. I appreciate it.
Basically everything is bullshit- why should this be an exception? But, yeah, exactly- this is low effort BS