perfectly in range of getting debris rained on it imo, including large beams. if you watch any video of the collapse that shit was being thrown all over the place
2 downvotes but nobody bothering to refute this. and you call yourselves "greatawakening" lmao. how are you ever gonna wake the fuck up if the only permissible viewpoint is that 100% of the theories are correct and proving otherwise is not permissible. pathetic
these buildings are LITERALLY next to ground zero:
Refute the lateral explosions in this section then: https://youtu.be/Ddz2mw2vaEg?t=1509 . Don't worry, this chapter is 140 seconds (2 minutes and 20 seconds).
If you can do that, try refute eyewitness reports of explosions: https://youtu.be/Ddz2mw2vaEg?t=1371 (This section is about 2 minutes and 20 seconds too)
i'm not refuting any explosions. i know for a fact these were controlled demolitions. but these beams ended up in adjacent buildings due to the debris of the collapse itself, not from being violently ejected as the direct result of an explosion. it's clear to me that the force of the plummetting upper section forced the outer shell to fall outwards in all directions. it can't fall inwards, and it can't freefall directly beneath itself either. this can be clearly percieved by just looking at the collapse, and the fact that a lot of it was shrouded in thick clouds of smoke and dust doesn't automatically leave the door open for inviting further complexity.
Explosions generally violently eject things within their blast radius, including beams.
it's clear to me that the force of the plummetting upper section - to this, you need to look at how WTC1/2 were built. They were a complete network of steel, and the only way floors 80 and below were compromised from doing their job of holding up all the floors above it, were as you noted.. with demolitions. Which are explosives, which eject things from its blast radius, including beams, laterally.
of all the weird shit that happened that day, this isn't one of them.
here's another angle
https://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/photos/docs/zomb/speared_bldg.jpg
perfectly in range of getting debris rained on it imo, including large beams. if you watch any video of the collapse that shit was being thrown all over the place
2 downvotes but nobody bothering to refute this. and you call yourselves "greatawakening" lmao. how are you ever gonna wake the fuck up if the only permissible viewpoint is that 100% of the theories are correct and proving otherwise is not permissible. pathetic
these buildings are LITERALLY next to ground zero:
https://www.google.com/maps/@40.7125825,-74.0140052,3a,75y,263.27h,139.18t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1snHgpTNE_anw4QsLbzVwAdQ!2e0!7i16384!8i8192
this corresponds to the north tower. this was the collapse radius that we all saw:
https://imgsnotigram.s3.amazonaws.com/uploads/2023/09/20230911105048062-0-2097473.jpg
it peeled like a fucking banana, of course beams are gonna end up in adjacent buildings
took me 30 seconds to find this
Refute the lateral explosions in this section then: https://youtu.be/Ddz2mw2vaEg?t=1509 . Don't worry, this chapter is 140 seconds (2 minutes and 20 seconds).
If you can do that, try refute eyewitness reports of explosions: https://youtu.be/Ddz2mw2vaEg?t=1371 (This section is about 2 minutes and 20 seconds too)
i'm not refuting any explosions. i know for a fact these were controlled demolitions. but these beams ended up in adjacent buildings due to the debris of the collapse itself, not from being violently ejected as the direct result of an explosion. it's clear to me that the force of the plummetting upper section forced the outer shell to fall outwards in all directions. it can't fall inwards, and it can't freefall directly beneath itself either. this can be clearly percieved by just looking at the collapse, and the fact that a lot of it was shrouded in thick clouds of smoke and dust doesn't automatically leave the door open for inviting further complexity.
Explosions generally violently eject things within their blast radius, including beams.
it's clear to me that the force of the plummetting upper section - to this, you need to look at how WTC1/2 were built. They were a complete network of steel, and the only way floors 80 and below were compromised from doing their job of holding up all the floors above it, were as you noted.. with demolitions. Which are explosives, which eject things from its blast radius, including beams, laterally.