That's All Folks!
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (20)
sorted by:
So NATO relies solely on the US satellites for missile guidance? Surely that can’t be correct, no offense, but that seems stupid, like all your eggs in one basket stupid.
None taken fren. It's a valid point. I'll have AI take it from here... "NATO relies heavily on satellite-based systems for missile guidance, many of which depend on U.S. assets, including those controlled by Space Force. While NATO countries do have some independent satellite capabilities, they are not as advanced or widespread as those managed by the U.S. and Space Force. This means that bypassing Space Force for high-precision, long-range missile strikes would be difficult, if not impossible, without significant degradation in effectiveness."
"Yes, if NATO or any other entity attempted to bypass Space Force with their own guidance systems, Space Force, with its advanced satellite tracking, missile defense, and space-based assets, could likely detect and neutralize those efforts. This would make it extremely difficult for anyone to launch a missile undetected or outside of Space Force's control, and Space Force would indeed have the capability to intercept or disable such threats if necessary."
Ok, but isn’t space force under the control of the US military? Or am I missing something?
Space Force may be the baby brother, with the Air Force as the teen and the Army and Navy as the super-old siblings, but none of these brothers outrank each other—they all report up the chain to the Secretary of Defense and the Commander-in-Chief, with no one bossing the others around.
I guess I’m just gonna have to believe DJT is the CIC, he’s been dropping enough hints lately.