It is true in a lot of cases I'm sure. It's a little weird to rank abusers as being "good" or not. There are a lot of ways to convey the idea of them being successful at their abuse without saying that.
I totally agree.
Because it isn't a matter if them being ...like...sexually good or skilled 🤮
It is more like how aggressive or passive the assault is in addition to the amount of grooming and the age/awareness of the victim.
Just like physical abuse, young kids may not know it is wrong/abuse despite bruises or bleeding in comparison to a teen who can learn by social comparison that it is wrong.
It is true in a lot of cases I'm sure. It's a little weird to rank abusers as being "good" or not. There are a lot of ways to convey the idea of them being successful at their abuse without saying that.
I totally agree. Because it isn't a matter if them being ...like...sexually good or skilled 🤮 It is more like how aggressive or passive the assault is in addition to the amount of grooming and the age/awareness of the victim. Just like physical abuse, young kids may not know it is wrong/abuse despite bruises or bleeding in comparison to a teen who can learn by social comparison that it is wrong.
It is super gross to say "If they are good" 🤮