It is assumed that the international banking cartel achieve their enforcement of financial systems through what is known as "big stick policy", right? Literally a protection racket on a global scale, with NATO, (in other words, USA) being the big stick. Debilitating sanctions followed by CIA-sponsored regime change to bring everyone in lockstep, and the establishment of a central bank and/or mandatory world bank loans (eternal debt & washington leverage) to recover from the devastation where appropriate, right? Or otherwise simply a CIA-sponsored regime change for the purposes of a designer war to nourish the military-industrial complex. We know that every major war is ultimately a banker's war, with USA's military being the big stick used to achieve this. The very existence of NATO, and europe's "vassal state" subservience rests entirely on USA being able to enforce this and project its military power across the globe, in particular the navy.

...right?

But then, if that's the case, why would they (the international banking cartel) compromise the integrity of the US military with debilitating DEI practices? ESG & DEI trickles down directly from the biggest banks, afaik. Aren't these DEI practices meant purely for the purpose of dividing and conquering civilians? If the strength and integrity of the US military is such a fundamental component of the international banking cartel's geopolitical grasp for preserving their financial status quo, why do we keep hearing how DEI is driving the US military into the ground? Why isn't the US military insulated from globohomo?

Who benefits from USA's military rotting from the inside? What am I missing in this puzzle? Does China play a role in this that I'm not seeing? Does the international banking cartel now favour china over USA for the role of the big stick, and are merely accelerating the transition? How can you even rot a nuclear power without eventually triggering an existential threat driven nuclear catastrophe? And no, I do not think nuclear war is desirable outcome for anyone involved, it would be too disruptive to the status quo which they have built upon for centuries.

TL;'DR: it appears to me that the same people who benefit from the strength of the US military are also the ones causing DEI to subvert the US military