I have been through this with every one of you guys and it is so boring.

Google query: Were the gospels written by eyewitnesses?

"Most scholars agree that they are the work of unknown Christians and were composed c.65-110 AD. The majority of New Testament scholars also agree that the Gospels do not contain eyewitness accounts; but that they present the theologies of their communities rather than the testimony of eyewitnesses."

"So these gospels, even if traditional authorship is granted, would not be eye witness testimony of Jesus."

"Even if the author of Luke was not himself an eyewitness, it does appear that he believed he was recording true history as delivered to him from eyewitnesses."

"The consensus among serious Biblical scholars is that none of the Gospels were written by eyewitnesses to the events in them."

"Despite patristic traditions to the contrary, it seems unlikely that any of the gospel writers were eyewitnesses themselves."

"For this reason, Ehrman concludes that the four Gospels could not have been written by eyewitnesses, but were written by others much later, who had not seen ..."

"There is nothing to indicate the authors of the Gospels thought they were eyewitnesses or using eyewitness testimony."

"The simple truth is that there is no verifiable basis for the historical claim that the gospels preserve reliable, eyewitness testimony about the events of ..."

It goes on and on.