Report: The Strategic Alliance Between the United States and Israel - A Pragmatic Analysis
Introduction
The relationship between the United States and Israel has long been regarded as one of mutual support, with the U.S. providing extensive military and economic assistance to Israel. This alliance is often presented as a natural bond based on shared values and common interests. However, there is an alternative perspective that suggests the U.S. supports Israel not because of an inherent, long-term friendship but due to the strategic advantage Israel provides in addressing other adversarial entities, particularly in the Middle East.
Historical Context
The U.S.-Israel relationship became especially significant after World War II and the establishment of Israel in 1948. The Cold War context further solidified this alliance, as Israel was viewed as a valuable partner in the battle against Soviet influence in the Middle East. More recently, Israel has been seen as a counterweight to Iran, a nation perceived by the United States as one of its most significant threats due to its nuclear ambitions and influence over regional militias.
A Pragmatic Alliance
The concept that "the enemy of my enemy is my friend" is often employed in international relations to describe alliances that are formed not out of friendship but out of necessity. In this context, it is possible that Israel’s role in the region is primarily that of a strategic partner against shared enemies, such as Iran, Hezbollah, and other groups opposed to Western influence. This temporary alignment of interests may mask deeper, underlying conflicts or divergent long-term goals between the U.S. and Israel.
Saving Israel for Last
A key phrase within the QAnon narrative is, "We are saving Israel for last." This phrase has been interpreted by some as an indication that Israel may be the focus of a major shift or reckoning once other objectives have been completed. According to this perspective, Israel's current alliance with the United States serves immediate strategic needs but could be re-evaluated or significantly altered in the future.
The pragmatic approach suggests that once the shared enemies, particularly Iran, have been neutralized, the dynamics of the U.S.-Israel relationship could change dramatically. This implies that the support provided to Israel is contingent upon the utility it offers in addressing these immediate threats.
Potential for a Shift in U.S.-Israel Relations
If Israel is, in fact, a long-term adversary of the United States, as suggested by some interpretations of the Q drop, the current support is a temporary measure to serve a broader strategy. In this scenario, the U.S. may reassess its relationship with Israel once its strategic objectives in the Middle East are achieved. This could include confronting perceived issues of influence, control, or actions by Israel that are seen as counter to American interests.
Conclusion
The U.S.-Israel alliance, while seemingly enduring, may be based on short-term strategic advantages rather than genuine, long-lasting friendship. The phrase "We are saving Israel for last" suggests that there may be underlying tensions or unresolved issues that will be addressed once other priorities, such as neutralizing threats from Iran, have been handled. This interpretation of the alliance as a temporary arrangement highlights the fluid and pragmatic nature of international relations, where alliances are often based on shifting interests rather than enduring loyalty.
Maybe he's padding the job.